Cases filed in the Second Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 170
Ellington v. Sanofi US Services Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv08197
Defendant: Sanofi US Services Inc., Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Inc., Hospira Worldwide, LLC and others
Plaintiff: Tanya Ellington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
In re Bystolic Antitrust Litigation
as 23-418
Debtor: In re: Watson Laboratories, Inc.
Plaintiff: J M Smith Corporation, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, DBA Smith Drug Company, KPH Healthcare Services, Inc., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated also known as Kinney Drugs, Inc, UFCW local 1500 Welfare Fund and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: Albertsons Companies, Inc., H-E-B L.P., The Kroger Co. and others
Defendant / Appellee: Forest Laboratories Inc., Forest Laboratories Ireland, LTD, Forest Laboratories Holdings Ltd. and others
In re Bystolic Antitrust Litigation
as 23-410
Debtor: In re: Watson Laboratories, Inc.
Plaintiff / Appellant: CVS Pharmacy, Inc., Rite Aid Corporation, Rite Aid Hdqtrs. Corp. and others
Defendant / Appellee: Forest Laboratories Inc., Forest Laboratories Ireland, LTD, Forest Laboratories Holdings Ltd. and others
In re Bystolic Antitrust Litigation
as 23-420
Debtor: In re: Watson Laboratories, Inc.
Plaintiff: J M Smith Corporation, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, DBA Smith Drug Company, KPH Healthcare Services, Inc., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated also known as Kinney Drugs, Inc, Albertsons Companies, Inc. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: UFCW local 1500 Welfare Fund, Teamsters Western Region & Local 177 Health Care Plan, Fraternal Order Of Police Miami Lodge 20, Insurance Trust Fund and others
Defendant / Appellee: Forest Laboratories Inc., Forest Laboratories Ireland, LTD, Forest Laboratories Holdings Ltd. and others
In re: In re Bystolic Antitrust Litigation
as 23-423
Debtor: In re: Watson Laboratories, Inc.
Plaintiff: UFCW local 1500 Welfare Fund, Teamsters Western Region & Local 177 Health Care Plan, Fraternal Order Of Police Miami Lodge 20, Insurance Trust Fund and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: J M Smith Corporation, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, DBA Smith Drug Company and KPH Healthcare Services, Inc., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated also known as Kinney Drugs, Inc
Defendant / Appellee: Forest Laboratories Inc., Forest Laboratories Ireland, LTD, Forest Laboratories Holdings Ltd. and others
Kulkarni v. Actavis Generics et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv05735
Plaintiff: Nivedita T. Kulkarni
Defendant: Actavis Generics, Actavis Laboratories UT, Inc., Actavis Laboratories FL, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pl Diversity-Product Liability
County Of Westchester v. Actavis Holdco US, Inc. et al
as 7:2021cv07893
Plaintiff: County Of Westchester
Defendant: Actavis Holdco US, Inc., Actavis Elizabeth LLC, Actavis Pharma, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15
Erie County Medical Center Corporation et al v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00826
Defendant: Actavis Pharma, Inc., Actavis LLC, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Erie County Medical Center Corporation, Catholic Health System, Inc., Sisters of Charity Hospital of Buffalo, New York and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Conley v. Anjanta Pharma USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00463
Defendant: Heritage Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Novitium Pharma, LLC, PAI Holdings, LLC and others
Plaintiff: Sandra Conley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
County of Albany et al v. Actavis Holdco US, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv01650
Defendant: Bausch Health Americas, Inc., Heritage Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Amneal Pharmaceuticals, LLC and others
Plaintiff: County of Schuyler, City of Mobile, WCA Group Health Trust and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?