Cases 1 - 7 of 7
City of South Sioux City, Nebraska v. AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation et al
as 8:2019cv00244
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Purdue Pharma L.P., Mallinckrodt LLC and others
Plaintiff:
City of South Sioux City Nebraska
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
County of Douglas, State of Nebraska v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 8:2019cv00049
Defendant:
Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc., McKesson Corporation, Endo Health Solutions, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
County of Douglas, State of Nebraska
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Sarpy County, Nebraska v. AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation et al
as 8:2018cv00387
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Mallinckrodt, LLC, Endo Health Solutions, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Sarpy County, Nebraska
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Winnebago Tribe of Nebraska et al v. McKesson Corporation et al
as 8:2018cv00203
Defendant:
Actavis Pharma, Inc., Actavis, LLC, Allergan PLC and others
Plaintiff:
Omaha Tribe of Nebraska, Santee Sioux Tribe of the Sioux Nation of the State of Nebraska and Winnebago Tribe of Nebraska
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
County of Knox, State of Nebraska v. McKesson Corporation et al
as 8:2018cv00181
Defendant:
Actavis LLC, Actavis Pharma, Inc., Allergan PLC and others
Plaintiff:
County of Knox, State of Nebraska
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Ponca Tribe of Nebraska v. McKesson Corporation et al
as 8:2018cv00180
Defendant:
Actavis LLC, Actavis Pharma, Inc., Allergan PLC and others
Plaintiff:
Ponca Tribe of Nebraska
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Sheahan et al v. Actavis Totowa LLC et al
as 8:2008cv00326
Plaintiff:
Karen Sheahan, Karen Sheahan, Paul Klopping and others
Defendant:
Actavis Totowa LLC, Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Mylan Bertek Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
