Cases 31 - 40 of 186
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00540
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv00243
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446
Unknown v. Unknown
as 1:2020cv00437
Defendant:
Acting Secretary Kevin McAleenan, Acting Director of F David Bowdich and District Director Thomas Cioppa
Plaintiff:
MOHAMED SABAGH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Mohammed v. McAleenan et al
as 1:2020cv00438
Plaintiff:
AHLAM MOHAMMED
Defendant:
Acting Secretary Kevin McAleenan, Acting Director of F David Bowdich and Thomas M Cioppa
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00364
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Aguirre v. Barr
as 20-51
Respondent:
Director Carl DuBois, Director of the Orange County Correctional Facility, Director Thomas Decker, New York Field Office Director for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Director James McHenry, Director, Executive Office of Immigration Review and others
Petitioner:
Efrain Fernandez Aguirre
Defendant / Appellant:
Acting Secretary Chad F. Wolf, Acting Secretary of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00115
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00136
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv11696
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv08309
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
