Cases 1 - 10 of 762
DePriest v. Andes
as 24-2261
Petitioner:
TIMOTHY DEPRIEST
Respondent:
CHANCE ANDES, Acting Warden, California State Prison at San Quentin
Dunsmore v. Jones, et al.
as 24-1907
Petitioner:
DARRYL DUNSMORE
Respondent:
GENA JONES, Acting Warden at the California Health Care Facility and ROBERT BONTA
Vanderwood v. Huston
as 24-1666
Petitioner:
MICHAEL LAMAR VANDERWOOD
Respondent:
MONA D. HUSTON, Acting Warden, California Institution for Men, Chino
George v. Allen
as 5:2024cv01422
Petitioner:
Keenan George
Respondent:
Acting Warden Trent Allen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cisneros v. Allen
as 4:2024cv00822
Plaintiff:
Miguel A. Cisneros
Defendant:
Acting Warden Trent Allen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sayres v. State of California et al
as 3:2024cv00330
Plaintiff:
Tadashi Sayres
Defendant:
State of California, State of California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, San Quentin State Prison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brian Thomas Cruz v. Gena Jones et al.
as 2:2024cv00410
Petitioner:
Brian Thomas Cruz
Respondent:
Acting Warden Gena Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nicholas Hiawatha Marshall v. Leanna Lundy et al
as 2:2024cv00411
Petitioner:
Nickolas Hiawatha Marshall
Respondent:
Acting Warden Leanna Lundy and Leanna Lundy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stanley v. CDCR et al
as 4:2024cv00013
Plaintiff:
Mark Stanley
Defendant:
CDCR, San Quentin State Prison, R. Broomfield and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Hill v. Allen
as 4:2024cv00005
Petitioner:
Derek A. Hill
Respondent:
Acting Warden Trent Allen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
