Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Gifford v. Phillip et al
as 3:2023cv00347
Plaintiff:
Adam Clayton Gifford
Defendant:
Weldy Phillip, Derek Daugherty, Beard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Matthew E. Orso v. Todd Disner et al
as 2:2021mc00249
Defendant:
Trudy Gilmond, David Kettner, David Sorrells and others
Petitioner:
Nationwide Judgment Recovery Inc
Plaintiff:
Matthew E Orso In his capacity as court appointed Receiver for Rex Venture Group, LLC doing business as ZeekRewards.com and Matthew E. Orso in his capacity as court-appointed Receiver for Rex Venture Group LLC doing business as ZeekRewards.com
Zilm v. Crow
as 4:2020cv00509
Plaintiff:
Adam Clayton Zilm
Defendant:
Scott Crow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
CLAYTON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv50826
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ADAM CLAYTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CLAYTON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv73623
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ADAM CLAYTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
(PC) Powell v. County of Solano et al
as 2:2019cv02459
Defendant:
Solano Sheriff Department Captain, Brian K. Taylor, N. Paulin and others
Plaintiff:
Adam Clayton Powell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOFFMAN et al v 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv03266
Plaintiff:
RICHARD FREMONT, MATTHEW SPILLERS, TRACY NESBITT and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hoffman et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02245
Plaintiff:
Richard Fremont, Matthew Spillers, Tracy Nesbitt and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies, LLC
Gifford v. Fuller et al
as 1:2019cv00228
Plaintiff:
Adam Clayton Gifford
Defendant:
Scotty McKay, Jason Taylor, Tracie Partin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
