Cases 1 - 10 of 13
US v. Charles Johnson
as 23-6747
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
CHARLES ELOYS JOHNSON, a/k/a Adam White
Harris II et al v. Farnsworth Jr et al
as 1:2022cv01378
Plaintiff:
Eugene Harris II and Tenekia L. Harris
Defendant:
E. Edward Farnsworth Jr, William Adam White, Samuel I. White, P.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
US v. Charles Johnson
as 21-7148
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
CHARLES ELOYS JOHNSON, a/k/a Adam White
US v. Charles Johnson
as 17-4220
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CHARLES ELOYS JOHNSON, a/k/a Adam White
Janice Jackson v. Branch Banking & Trust Company
as 16-1536
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JANICE JACKSON
Defendant - Appellee:
BRANCH BANKING & TRUST COMPANY, BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST COMPANY (BB&T) REGISTERED AGENT, SAMUEL I. WHITE, P.C. and others
White et al v. Lumber Liquidators Inc
as 1:2015cv02687
Plaintiff:
Adam White and Julia White
Defendant:
Lumber Liquidators, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
White et al v. Lumber Liquidators Inc
as 2:2015cv01175
Plaintiff:
Adam White and Julia White
Defendant:
Lumber Liquidators Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jackson v. Branch Banking and Trust Company (BB&T) et al
as 8:2014cv03155
Plaintiff:
Janice Jackson
Defendant:
Branch Banking and Trust Company (BB&T), Branch Banking and Trust Company (BB&T) Registered Agent, Samuel Samuel I. White, P.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ibrahim v. 21st Mortgage Corporation et al
as 1:2014cv01222
Plaintiff:
Saide Ibrahim
Defendant:
21st Mortgage Corporation , Samuel I. White, P.C. and William Adam White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Scott v. US Bank, NA, et al
as 2:2009mc00012
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Scott
Defendant:
US Bank, NA, Wells Fargo Bank, NA, MERS Corporation, Inc. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
