Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Marlon Altamirano, et al v. Arnold Schwarzenegger, et al
as 19-17099
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ELMOR JACOB DELEON, MANUEL TEJEDA, JOHNNY O. SANCHEZ and others
Defendant / Appellee:
TANYA ROTHCHILD, Former Chief of the Classification Services Unit, MATTHEW CATE, Former Secretary of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, JAMES D. HARTLEY, Warden, Former Warden Avenal State Prison and others
Sepulveda v. California Correctional Health Services et al
as 2:2016cv01537
Plaintiff:
Adrian Sepulveda
Defendant:
California Correctional Health Services and California Department of Correction & Rehabilitation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Altamirano et al v. Schwarzenegger et al
as 1:2015cv00607
Plaintiff:
Marlon Altamirano , Derrico Aubrey , Myrick Banks and others
Defendant:
Arnold Schwarzenegger, Jeffrey Beard, Paul Brazelton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Altamirano et al v. Schwarzenegger et al
as 1:2015at00324
Plaintiff:
Marlon Altamirano , Derrico Aubrey , Myrick Banks and others
Defendant:
Arnold Schwarzenegger, Jeffrey Beard, Paul Brazelton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Abukar et al v. Schwarzenegger, et al
as 1:2014cv00816
Plaintiff:
Abdulle Abukar , Ruben Arechiga , John Wesley Bess and others
Defendant:
Arnold Schwarzenegger, Edmund G. Brown, Jeffrey A. Beard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Abukar et al v. Schwarzenegger, et al
as 2:2014cv01137
Plaintiff:
Abdulle Abukar , Ruben Arechiga , John Wesley Bess and others
Defendant:
Arnold Schwarzenegger, Edmund G. Brown, Jeffrey A. Beard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Abukar et al v. McQuarn et al
as 2:2014at00586
Plaintiff:
Abdulle Abukar , Ruben Arechiga , John Wesley Bess and others
Defendant:
Charles McQuarn, Arnold Schwarzenegger, Edmund G. Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
