Cases 1 - 10 of 20
James Parsons, III v. Sheriff of Jefferson County, Alabama, et al
as 22-13521
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES W. PARSONS, III
Defendant / Appellee:
MARK PETTWAY, ADVANCED CORRECTIONAL HEALTHCARE, INC and SHERIFF OF JEFFERSON COUNTY, ALABAMA
Garrison v. Pettway et al
as 2:2021cv01580
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Wayne Garrison
Defendant:
Mark Pettway, Advanced Correctional Healthcare Inc and Jefferson County, Alabama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jolene Hastings v. Marlee Bell, et al
as 20-13161
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE
Defendant / Appellee:
TALIA TUSSELL, TERRY SCOTT, KATELYN PAYNE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOLENE GUNTER HASTINGS, as the administrator of the estate of Kathleen Taylor Gunter
Parsons v. Pettway et al
as 2:2020cv00806
Defendant:
Mark Pettway and Advanced Correctional Healthcare Inc
Plaintiff:
James W Parsons, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hastings v. Advanced Correctional Healthcare Inc et al
as 2:2020cv00002
Defendant:
Advanced Correctional Healthcare Inc, Katelyn Payne, Sarah Gardner and others
Plaintiff:
Jolene Gunter Hastings
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jenkins v. Hutton et al
as 7:2018cv00861
Plaintiff:
Earnest Jenkins
Defendant:
Edward Hutton, Jordan, Robert Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv01521
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117
Davis v. Madison County Alabama et al
as 5:2016cv01166
Plaintiff:
Roy Lee Davis
Defendant:
Madison County Alabama, Blake Dorning, Steve Morrison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Piercy v. Warkins et al
as 5:2016mc00858
Plaintiff:
Aaron Piercy
Defendant:
Julie Warkins , Dan Williams and Advanced Correctional Healthcare Inc
Piercy v. Wilhelmi et al
as 5:2016mc00788
Plaintiff:
Aaron Piercy
Defendant:
Kelly Wilhelmi, Julie Warkins , Dan Williams and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
