Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Roy v. Aerogroup Retail Holdings, Inc.
as 1:2015cv02941
Plaintiff:
Jodi Roy
Defendant:
Aerogroup Retail Holdings, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Sanchez v. Aerogroup Retail Holdings, Inc et al
as 5:2012cv05445
Plaintiff:
Jessica Sanchez
Defendant:
Aerogroup Retail Holdings, Inc and Does 1-50
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
SCOTT v. AEROGROUP INTERNATIONAL, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv05847
Plaintiff:
ANDREW SCOTT
Defendant:
AEROGROUP INTERNATIONAL, INC. , AEROGROUP INTERNATIONAL, LLC , AEROGROUP INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2009cv60310
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2009cv60309
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2009cv60311
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2009cv60312
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2009cv60313
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Ware et al v. Aerogroup Retail Holdings, Inc. et al
as 4:2008cv00012
Plaintiff:
Paul N. Ware, Paul N. Ware, Paul N. Ware and others
Defendant:
Aerogroup Retail Holdings, Inc., Borders, Inc., Christopher & Banks, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Ware et al v. Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc. et al
as 4:2007cv00122
Plaintiff:
Paul N. Ware and Financial Systems Innovation LLC
Defendant:
Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc., Aeropostale, Inc., Aerogroup Retail Holdings, Inc. and others
Debtor:
West Marine Products, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
