Cases 1 - 10 of 332
Ahlstrom et al v. Aerotek, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00507
Plaintiff:
Joshua Ahlstrom, Lydell Burston and Quintin Baker
Defendant:
Aerotek, Inc., Sekisui Diagnostics, LLC and Does 1 to 10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Aerotek, Inc. v. Montaplast of North America, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00014
Plaintiff:
Aerotek, Inc.
Defendant:
Montaplast of North America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00199
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Aerotek Inc. v. Babcock & Wilcox Solar Energy, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00177
Defendant:
Babcock & Wilcox Solar Energy, Inc. and Fosler Construction Company, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Aerotek Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Aerotek, Inc. v. Power Industries, LLC
as 3:2023cv01643
Plaintiff:
Aerotek, Inc
Defendant:
Power Industries, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Aerotek, Inc. et al v. ML Builders, LLC
as 6:2023cv05557
Plaintiff:
Aerotek, Inc. and Actalent, Inc.
Defendant:
ML Builders, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01388
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00126
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv02039
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
