Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Deng et al v. BNP Paribas, S.A. et al
as 1:2023cv07468
Plaintiff: Deng Yel Akol Deng, Yussif Mohammed Sabil, Salah Bahket Bahket and others
Defendant: BNP Paribas, S.A., BNP Paribas, S.A., New York Branch and BNP Paribas US Wholesale Holdings, Corp.
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider: Charity Lowoh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pi Diversity-Personal Injury
Anas Elhady v. Charles Kable, IV
as 20-1311
Plaintiff / Appellee: SAMIR ANWAR, WAEL HAKMEH, MURAT FRLJUCKIE and others
Defendant / Appellant: KEVIN K. MCALEENAN, Acting Commissioner of United States Customs and Border Protection in his official capacity, CHARLES H. KABLE, IV, Director of the Terrorist Screening Center, in his official capacity, NICHOLAS J. RASMUSSEN, Director of the National Counterterrorism Center in his official capacity and others
Amicus Curiae: THE RUTHERFORD INSTITUTE, CATO INSTITUTE, FRED T. KOREMATSU CENTER FOR LAW & EQUALITY and others
Not Yet Classified: ALAN MICHAEL MYGATT-TAUBER
Federal Insurance, et al v. Al Qaida, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2003cv06978
Defendant: Saudi High Commission, Abu Qatada Al-Filistini, Abu Hafs The Mauritanian and others
Cross Defendant: Khalid Shaikh Mohammed and Mustafa Ahmed Al-Hawsawi
Plaintiff: ACE Global Market Syndicate 2488, Hiscox Dedicated Corporate Member, Ltd., ALL PLAINTIFFS and others
Petitioner: The Royal Embassy of Saudi Arabia, Ahmed A. Kattan and Abdul Rahman I. Al-Noah
Interested Party: United States of America
Intervenor: James Owens, et al.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Anas Elhady v. Charles Kable We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-1119
Plaintiff / Appellee: SAMIR ANWAR, WAEL HAKMEH, MURAT FRLJUCKIE and others
Defendant / Appellant: KEVIN K. MCALEENAN, Acting Commissioner of United States Customs and Border Protection in his official capacity, CHARLES H. KABLE, IV, Director of the Terrorist Screening Center, in his official capacity, NICHOLAS J. RASMUSSEN, Director of the National Counterterrorism Center in his official capacity and others
Charles Kable, IV v. Anas Elhady
as 20-154
Respondent: MICHAEL EDMUND COLEMAN, MUHAMMAD YAHYA KHAN, JOHN DOE, No. 4 and others
Petitioner: CHARLES H. KABLE, IV, Director of the Terrorist Screening Center, in his official capacity, NICHOLAS J. RASMUSSEN, Director of the National Counterterrorism Center in his official capacity, KEVIN K. MCALEENAN, Acting Commissioner of United States Customs and Border Protection in his official capacity and others
Ahmad Ibrahim v. Sentinel Insurance Company Ltd et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv02488
Defendant: Brandon Sullivan, Sentinel Insurance Company, Ltd. and Sentinel Insurance Company Ltd
Plaintiff: Ahmad Ibrahim
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mocha Mill, Inc. et al v. Port of Mokha, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2018cv02539
Plaintiff: Mocha Mill, Inc. , Monk of Mocha Specialty Coffee Production and Export, Inc. , Ibrahim A. Alaeli and others
Defendant: Port of Mokha, Inc., Port of Mokha LLP, Mokha Foundation and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Doe et al v. Piehota et al
as 1:2016cv00373
Plaintiff: Baby Doe , Yaseen Kadura , Anas Elhady and others
Defendant: Christopher M. Piehota, Robin C. Burke, Timothy J. Healy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Elhady et al v. Piehota et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv00375
Plaintiff: Anas Elhady , Osama Hussein Ahmed , Ahmad Ibrahim Al Halabi and others
Defendant: Christopher M. Piehota, Steven Mabeus, G. Clayton Grigg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Joe Hand Promotions Inc v. Hamdi Ahmad Ibrahim
as 5:2013cv02345
Defendant: Hamdi Ahmad Ibrahim
Plaintiff: Joe Hand Promotions Inc

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?