Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Aiad-Toss v. USA
as 4:2022cv01289
Petitioner:
Albert Aiad-Toss
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
USA v. Albert Aiad-Toss
as 21-3548
Defendant / Appellant:
ALBERT AIAD-TOSS, aka Albert Shockry Aiad-Toss
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Guzman v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 4:2013cv01205
Plaintiff:
Wilmer A Guzman
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America , Michael V. Pugh , Albert Aiad-Toss, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Acosta v. Corrections Corporation Of America et al
as 4:2010cv00885
Plaintiff:
Miquea Isidro Acosta
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation Of America, Aiad Toss, Dana Orenic and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fernando Gonzalez-Barrera v. Corrections Corp of America, et al
as 09-4563
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FERNANDO GONZALEZ-BARRERA
Defendant - Appellee:
CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA, AIAD TOSS, DANIEL HALL and others
Gonzalez-Barrera v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 4:2009cv01806
Plaintiff:
Fernando Gonzalez-Barrera
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America, Aiad Toss, Daniel Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Guerrero v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 4:2009cv00071
Plaintiff:
Nelson Guerrero
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America, Joseph Gunja, Aiad Toss and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Ciarla v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 4:2008cv01351
Plaintiff:
Anthony Ciarla
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America, Northeast Ohio Correctional Center, Joseph Gunja and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Santo v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 4:2008cv00901
Plaintiff:
Jesus Espiritu Santo
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America, Joseph Gunja, Galey Gates and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
