Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Guillen v. Horry County Council et al
as 4:2017cv00400
Plaintiff:
Alfonso Guillen
Defendant:
Horry County Council , Harold Worley , Mark Lazarus and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davis v. Horry County Council et al
as 4:2017cv00391
Plaintiff:
Mike Davis
Defendant:
Horry County Council, Harold Worley, Mark Lazarus and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Boulineau v. Horry County Council et al
as 4:2017cv00394
Plaintiff:
Amanda Boulineau
Defendant:
Horry County Council, Harold Worley, Mark Lazarus and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Clarke v. Horry County Council et al
as 4:2017cv00401
Plaintiff:
Tyler Clarke
Defendant:
Horry County Council , Harold Worley , Mark Lazarus and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ringley v. Horry County Council et al
as 4:2017cv00395
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Ringley
Defendant:
Horry County Council, Harold Worley, Mark Lazarus and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Al Allen v. Brenna Rhea Jorgensen et al
as 2:2013cv01026
Plaintiff:
Al Allen
Defendant:
Does and Brenna Rhea Jorgensen
Joseph Herron v. Horry County, South Carolina
as 13-6000
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH HERRON
Defendant - Appellee:
HORRY COUNTY, SOUTH CAROLINA, TOM RICE, HAROLD WORLEY and others
Defendant:
J REUBEN LONG DETENTION CENTER
Collins v. Thompson et al
as 9:2012cv00759
Plaintiff:
Frenchmen DeShawn Collins
Defendant:
Phillip Thompson, Tom Fox, Tom Rice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hornsby v. Thompson et al
as 0:2011cv01749
Plaintiff:
Christopher Dean Hornsby
Defendant:
Phillip Thompson, Debroah Hipp, Tom Fox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Herron v. Horry County South Carolina et al
as 4:2011cv01377
Plaintiff:
Joseph Herron
Defendant:
Horry County South Carolina, J Reuben Long Detention Center, Tom Rice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
