Cases 1 - 10 of 129
Johnson v. Alabama Board of Pardons and Paroles
as 6:2023cv00645
Petitioner:
Gus Johnson
Respondent:
Alabama Board of Pardons and Paroles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jones v. Calloway (INMATE 3)
as 2:2023cv00165
Plaintiff:
Frederick Dwight Jones
Defendant:
Kim Willingham, Alabama Board of Pardons and Paroles, Terry Anthony and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ruggs v. Crabtree et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2022cv00471
Plaintiff:
Michael Ruggs and Nathaniel Ruggs
Defendant:
Chadwick Crabtree, Steven T. Marshall, Alabama Board of Pardons and Paroles and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dixon v. Carter et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2022cv00359
Plaintiff:
William Dewayne Dixon
Defendant:
Karen Carter, Steven T. Marshall and Alabama Board of Pardons and Paroles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00342
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00344
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00345
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00339
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00340
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00341
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.