Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Wilson v. Stewart, et al
as 3:2019cv00015
Defendant:
Officer Stewart, Forrest L Wallace, Officer Alan Stewart
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Lucas Wilson
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Hanson v. USA et al
as 6:2018cv00017
Plaintiff:
Bryan Alan Hanson
Defendant:
USA, Federal Bureau of Prisons, S. Butler
and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question: Bivens Act
Bennett v. Cooper et al
as 3:2017cv01467
Plaintiff:
Corey Alan Bennett
Defendant:
Korey Cooper, Robin Fish, Dan Wilson
and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Elijah Ford v. Michael Kennerly, et al
as 17-1583
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ELIJAH M. FORD
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL C. KENNERLY, Physician Assistant, ROGER A. GERLACH, Medical Doctor, RICHARD CZOP, Medical Doctor
and others
Wilson v. USA
as 4:2015cv12614
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Jerome Alan Wilson
Cause Of Action: Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Julian Rochester v. Federal Prison Director, et al
as 15-5670
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JULIAN E. ROCHESTER
Defendant - Appellee:
FEDERAL PRISON DIRECTOR, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, WILLIAM N. NETTLES, S.C. U.S. Attorney
and others
Julian Rochester v. William Nettles, et al
as 15-5474
Petitioner - Appellant:
JULIAN E. ROCHESTER
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM N. NETTLES, BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, ALAN WILSON
and others
Rochester v. Federal Prison Director et al
as 3:2015cv00342
Plaintiff:
Julian E. Rochester
Defendant:
Federal Prison Director, U. S. Atty. Gen., W. N. Nettles
and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Rochester v. Harwell et al
as 3:2015cv00308
Plaintiff:
Julian E. Rochester
Defendant:
R.B. Harwell, K.F. McDonald, J. M. Childs
and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Rochester v. Wilson et al
as 3:2015cv00226
Plaintiff:
Julian E. Rochester
Defendant:
Alan Wilson, A-Gen, SCDC
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
