Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 399
Disability Rights South Carolina et al v. McMaster et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2021cv02728
Plaintiff: Disability Rights South Carolina, Able South Carolina, Amanda McDougald Scott and others
Defendant: Henry McMaster, Alan Wilson, State Superintendent Molly Spearman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117
Brown v. The State of South Carolina et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2021cv02405
Plaintiff: Demetrius Alexander Brown
Defendant: The State of South Carolina, The County of Sumter, South Carolina, Henry McMaster and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Defenders of Wildlife v. United States Fish and Wildlife Service
as 21-1759
Plaintiff / Appellee: DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE
Defendant / Appellant: UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Intervenor Defendant: CHARLES RIVER LABORATORIES INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Intervenor: STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA EX REL ALAN WILSON, ATTORNEY GENERAL and SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION
Defenders of Wildlife v. State of South Carolina
as 21-1708
Plaintiff / Appellee: DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE
Intervenor Defendant: CHARLES RIVER LABORATORIES INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Defendant: UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Intervenor: STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA EX REL ALAN WILSON, ATTORNEY GENERAL and SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION
Robert Koon v. Warden, McCormick Correctional Institution We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-6795
Petitioner / Appellant: ROBERT HOLLAND KOON, a/k/a Robert Koon, a/k/a Robert H. Koon
Respondent: ALAN WILSON
Respondent / Appellee: WARDEN, MCCORMICK CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Defenders of Wildlife v. Charles River Laboratories International, Inc.
as 21-1589
Plaintiff / Appellee: DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant: CHARLES RIVER LABORATORIES INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Defendant: UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Intervenor: STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA EX REL ALAN WILSON, ATTORNEY GENERAL and SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION
Hawkins et al v. South Carolina Commission on Lawyer Conduct, The et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2021cv01319
Defendant: John S Nichols, South Carolina Commission on Lawyer Conduct, The, Alan Wilson and others
Plaintiff: John Hawkins and HawkLaw PA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Planned Parenthood South Atlantic v. Alan Wilson We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-1369
Defendant: EDWARD SIMMER, in his official capacity as Director of the South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control, SCARLETT A. WILSON, in her official capacity as Solicitor for South Carolina's 9th Judicial Circuit, CHRISTOPHER C. WRIGHT, in his official capacity as a Member of the South Carolina Board of Medical Examiners and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: GREENVILLE WOMEN'S CLINIC, on behalf of itself, its patients, and its physicians and staff, PLANNED PARENTHOOD SOUTH ATLANTIC, on behalf of itself, its patients, and its physicians and staff and TERRY L. BUFFKIN, M.D., on behalf of himself and his patients
Intervenor: HENRY MCMASTER, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of South Carolina and JAMES H. LUCAS, a/k/a Jay, in his official capacity as Speaker of the South Carolina House of Representatives
Defendant / Appellant: WILLIAM WALTER WILKINS, III, in his official capacity as Solicitor for South Carolina's 13th Judicial Circuit and ALAN WILSON, in his official capacity as Attorney General of South Carolina
Goss v. Armstrong et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv00900
Defendant: Julie J Armstrong and Alan Wilson
Plaintiff: Darrell L Goss
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Koon v. Wilson
as 4:2021cv01026
Petitioner: Robert Holland Koon, Robert H. Koon and Robert Koon
Respondent: Alan Wilson and Warden McCormick Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?