Cases 71 - 80 of 204
Rochester v. South Carolina, State of et al
as 6:2018cv02802
Defendant:
Witkowski, SCDC, South Carolina, State of and others
Plaintiff:
Julian E Rochester
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hunsberger v. Duran et al
as 8:2018cv01813
Defendant:
Melody Jane Brown, Alton Eargle, John McIntosh and others
Plaintiff:
Julio A Hunsberger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
South Carolina Electric & Gas Company v. Whitfield et al
as 3:2018cv01795
Defendant:
Swain E Whitfield, Elizabeth B Fleming, Robert T Bockman and others
Intervenor Defendant:
James H Lucas and Hugh K Leatherman, Sr
Plaintiff:
South Carolina Electric & Gas Company
Petitioner:
LeBrian Cleckley, Phillip Cooper, Richard Lightsey and others
Amicus Curiae:
Alan Wilson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Jordan v. Wilson
as 3:2018cv01589
Plaintiff:
Diana Jordan
Defendant:
Alan Wilson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Sturkey v. Wilson et al
as 7:2018cv01558
Plaintiff:
Willie Joe Sturkey
Defendant:
Alan Wilson, Sheriff Taylor, B George and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
El v. Wean et al
as 2:2018cv01519
Plaintiff:
Bakha Yawuti El
Defendant:
Matthew Wean, Diane Turner, B Wade and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smyth v. Wilson et al
as 0:2018cv01443
Plaintiff:
Keith Adger Smyth
Defendant:
Alan Wilson, J. Derham Cole and Anthony C. Leibert
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tyler v. Wilson et al
as 4:2018cv01340
Plaintiff:
Larry James Tyler
Defendant:
Alan Wilson and Judge Henderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Washington v. Williams et al
as 9:2018cv01160
Petitioner:
William Washington
Respondent:
Warden Williams and Alan Wilson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Wood v. United States of America, The et al
as 2:2018cv00328
Petitioner:
Carolynn Elizbeth Wood
Respondent:
United States of America, The, State of South Carolina, The, Jeff Sessions and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
