Cases 1 - 10 of 36
Albert Harris v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2023cv04342
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Albert Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Perez v. Harris et al
as 3:2022cv00336
Plaintiff:
Julio Sosa Perez
Defendant:
John Albert Harris, FreightWorks, LLC, National Interstate Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Luke Waid, et al v. Richard Snyder, et al
as 22-1197
Not Classified By Court:
In re: FLINT WATER CASES
Plaintiff:
LUKE WAID
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CO-LEAD COUNSEL FOR THE SETTLEMENT CLASS and CO-LIAISON COUNSEL FOR THE INDIVIDUAL PLAINTIFFS
Defendant:
RICHARD DALE SNYDER
Appellant:
HELEN CHAPMAN, DOROTHY CHAPMAN, SHAMIYA CHAPMAN and others
Richard Albert Harris, Jr. v. Andrew Saul
as 2:2021cv01307
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Richard Albert Harris, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Gonzalez v. Florida City et al
as 1:2020cv23306
Plaintiff:
Yaishali Gonzalez
Defendant:
Florida City and Albert Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Theron Rhoten, et al v. Brent Stroman, et al
as 20-50276
Plaintiff / Appellee:
BONAR CRUMP, JR., RYAN WILLIAM CRAFT, JONATHAN LOPEZ and others
Defendant / Appellant:
DETECTIVE JEFFREY ROGERS, in his individual capacity, DETECTIVE MANUEL CHAVEZ, in his individual capacity, DISTRICT ATTORNEY ABELINO REYNA, in his individual capacity and others
HARRIS v. ZATECKY
as 1:2019cv00626
Petitioner:
ALBERT HARRIS
Respondent:
DUSHAN ZATECKY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HARRIS v. ZATECKY
as 1:2019cv00627
Petitioner:
ALBERT HARRIS
Respondent:
DUSHAN ZATECKY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HARRIS v. ZATECKY
as 1:2019cv00624
Petitioner:
ALBERT HARRIS
Respondent:
DUSHAN ZATECKY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HARRIS v. ZATECKY
as 1:2019cv00625
Petitioner:
ALBERT HARRIS
Respondent:
DUSHAN ZATECKY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
