Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Marhone v. Cassel
as 22-2912
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Conrad Marhone
Defendant / Appellee:
Correction Officer J. Cassel, Correction Officer of Sing Sing Correctional Facility, Correction Officer Wright, Correction Officer at Sing Sing Correctional Facility, DSS Keysor, Deputy Superintendent at Sing Sing Correctional Facility and others
Defendant:
Captain Laporto, Captain at Sing Sing Correctional Facility
Harvey v. Melville et al
as 1:2018cv07043
Plaintiff:
Umar Harvey
Defendant:
Melville, Albert Prack and Anthony Annucci
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harvey v. Melville et al
as 7:2018cv07043
Plaintiff:
Umar Harvey
Defendant:
Captain Melville, Anthony Annucci and Albert Prack
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Best v. Fischer et al
as 6:2016cv06225
Plaintiff:
Sean Best
Defendant:
Brian Fischer, E. Gutwoin, Larkin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smolen, Jr. v. Wesley et al
as 1:2016cv02417
Plaintiff:
Samuel J Smolen, Jr.
Defendant:
C.O. M. Wesley, C.O. W. Stevens, C.O. C. Lampon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ruggiero v. Fischer et al
as 1:2015cv00962
Plaintiff:
Anthony Ruggiero
Defendant:
Brian Fischer, H. Hetrick, Jr., Albert Prack and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holgate v. Prack et al
as 6:2015cv06422
Plaintiff:
Geoffery Holgate
Defendant:
Albert Prack and R. Conrad
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Best v. Fischer et al
as 1:2015cv05624
Plaintiff:
Sean Best
Defendant:
Brian Fischer, E. Gutwoin, Larkin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holgate v. Prack et al
as 1:2015cv05352
Plaintiff:
Geoffery Holgate
Defendant:
Albert Prack and R. Conrad
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blast v. Griffin et al
as 1:2015cv01558
Plaintiff:
Synthia-China Blast
Defendant:
Patrick J. Griffin, Jason D. Effman, Deputy Inspector General of the Sex Crimes Unit for ("DOCCS") and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
