Cases 11 - 20 of 43
Maclennan v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 4:2007cv02133
Plaintiff:
Jason Maclennan
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons, T. R. Sniezek, J.T. Shartle and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Hassan v. Gonzales et al
as 2:2007cv00617
Plaintiff:
Mohamud Farah Hassan
Defendant:
Alberto Gonzales, Robert S Mueller, Michael Chertoff and others
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Osei v. Baker et al
as 2:2007cv00597
Plaintiff:
David Osei
Defendant:
Neal Baker, Field Office Director, Detroit District, Julie Myers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Sukhomlinova v. Chertoff et al
as 1:2007cv01829
Plaintiff:
Ludmila Sukhomlinova
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff, Emilio T. Gonzalez, Mark B. Hansen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Zabteyaa v. Hansen et al
as 2:2007cv00520
Plaintiff:
Suhir Ammar Zabteyaa
Defendant:
Mark Hansen, Emilio Gonzalez, Michael Chertoff and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Clements v. Gonzales et al
as 4:2007cv01596
Petitioner:
George Clements
Respondent:
Alberto Gonzales, Gregory A. White and Robert M. Tapia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Duri v. Hansen et al
as 1:2007cv01599
Plaintiff:
Kliton Duri
Defendant:
Mark Hansen, Alberto Gonzales, Emilio T. Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Cici v. Hansen et al
as 1:2007cv01598
Plaintiff:
Markela Cici
Defendant:
Mark Hansen, Alberto Gonzales, Emilio T. Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv00206
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Shah v. Hansen
as 1:2007cv01576
Plaintiff:
Rahul Shah
Defendant:
Mark Hansen, Alberto Gonzales, Michael Chertoff and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
