Cases 31 - 40 of 110
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv02093
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Viol. of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
LINDER v. GONZALES et al
as 1:2007cv02029
Plaintiff:
DAVID LINDER
Defendant:
ALBERTO GONZALES and PAUL J. MCNULTY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. GONZALES et al
as 1:2007cv02040
Petitioner:
JAMES E. WILLIAMS, JR.
Respondent:
ALBERTO GONZALES and HARLEY G. LAPPIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
MCGEE v. UNITED STATES et al
as 1:2007cv01923
Plaintiff:
STEVEN A. MCGEE
Defendant:
ALBERTO GONZALES, KAREN TANDY, JOHN F. CLARK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. GONZALES et al
as 1:2007cv01916
Plaintiff:
JAMES S. JONES
Defendant:
ALBERTO GONZALES and UNKNOWN DEFENDANTS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HAMILTON v. GONZALES et al
as 1:2007cv01692
Respondent:
ALBERTO GONZALES, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and HARLEY LAPPIN
Petitioner:
DAVID L. HAMILTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
DIXON v. GONZALES et al
as 1:2007cv01687
Plaintiff:
JERMAINE DIXON
Defendant:
ALBERTO GONZALES and G. STEWART
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
KUON v. GONZALES et al
as 1:2007cv01700
Petitioner:
BILLY KUON
Respondent:
ALBERTO GONZALES, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and HARLEY LAPPIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
VALLIERE v. GONZALES et al
as 1:2007cv01680
Petitioner:
DEMOND S. VALLIERE
Respondent:
ALBERTO GONZALES and HARLEY LAPPIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
BAHI et al v. GONZALES et al
as 1:2007cv01650
Plaintiff:
CONSTANT OTTRO BAHI, FATOU FLORENCE KOUADIO and PAULE EMMANUELLE BAHI
Defendant:
ALBERTO GONZALES, MICHAEL CHERTOFF, EMILIO GONZALES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
