Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Vallesillo v. Vanguard Equities, LLC et al

as 8:2024cv00467
Defendant:
Vanguard Equities, LLC and Jerome Cerillo
Plaintiff:
Alejandro Vallesillo
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Vallesillo v. TheLendingFamily.com

as 8:2024cv00343
Defendant:
TheLendingFamily.com
Plaintiff:
Alejandro Vallesillo
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Vallesillo v. Money Tree Merchant Services Corp.

as 8:2023cv00536
Plaintiff:
Alejandro Vallesillo
Defendant:
Money Tree Merchant Services Corp.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Vallesillo v. Secure Capital Solutions, Inc. et al
as 8:2023cv00409
Plaintiff:
Alejandro Vallesillo
Defendant:
Secure Capital Solutions, Inc. and Jacob Saada
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv00400
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Vallesillo v. Lindner & Lindner

as 8:2023cv00308
Plaintiff:
Alejandro Vallesillo
Defendant:
Lindner & Lindner, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Vallesillo v. Premiumcapitalfund.com

as 1:2023cv03841
Plaintiff:
Alejandro Vallesillo
Defendant:
Premiumcaptitalfund.com and P.O. "John" Doe
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Vallesillo v. Premiumcapitalfund.com

as 8:2023cv00006
Plaintiff:
Alejandro Vallesillo
Defendant:
PREMIUMCAPITALFUND.COM
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Alejandro Vallesillo v. ARG Business Loans, LLC et al

as 8:2022cv01616
Plaintiff:
Alejandro Vallesillo
Defendant:
ARG Business Loans, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.