Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. United States Department of Health and Human Services et al
as 7:2020cv10488
Defendant:
United States Department of Health and Human Services, Seema Verma, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and others
Plaintiff:
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Amicus Curiae:
American Society of Clinical Oncology
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Coney Island Prep et al v. United States Department of Health And Human Services et al
as 1:2020cv09144
Plaintiff:
Coney Island Prep, Leslie-Bernard Joseph, Alexandra Greenberg and others
Defendant:
Dr. Robert R Redfield, Dr. Robert Kadlec, Alex M. Azar, II and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Gimadiev v. Azar et al
as 1:2020cv04248
Defendant:
Alex M. Azar, II, Robert R. Redfield, MD, Stephanie Michel and others
Plaintiff:
Ildar Gimadiev
Interested Party:
ARK Import Export Center, LLC doing business as The ARK at JFK, LLC
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Asapansa-Johnson Walker et al v. Azar II et al
as 1:2020cv02834
Defendant:
United States Department of Health and Human Services and Alex M. Azar II
Plaintiff:
Tanya Asapansa-Johnson Walker, Cecilia Gentili and House of Representatives
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Family Equality et al v. Azar et al
as 1:2020cv02403
Plaintiff:
Family Equality, True Colors United, Inc., Services & Advocacy for LGBT Elders and others
Defendant:
United States Department of Health and Human Services and Alex M. Azar, II
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Clinical Psychassociates Group, LLP v. Azar II
as 1:2020cv01448
Plaintiff:
Clinical Psychassociates Group, LLP
Defendant:
Alex M. Azar II
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Pfeiffer v. Azar, II
as 7:2019cv11897
Defendant:
Secretary Alex M. Azar, II
Plaintiff:
Margaret Pfeiffer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
Planned Parenthood Federation of America, Inc. et al v. Azar II et al
as 1:2019cv05433
Plaintiff:
Planned Parenthood Federation of America, Inc. and Planned Parenthood of Northern New England, Inc.
Defendant:
Office for Civil Rights, Roger Severino, Alex M. Azar II and others
Amicus Curiae:
the North American Society for Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology, the American College of Osteopathic Obstetricians and Gynecologists, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
National Family Planning and Reproductive Health Association et al v. Azar et al
as 1:2019cv05435
Plaintiff:
National Family Planning and Reproductive Health Association and Public Health Solutions, Inc.
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Alex M. Azar, II, Roger Severino and others
Amicus Curiae:
the American Muslim Health Professionals, Institute for Policy Integrity, The American Medical Association and others
Interested Party:
Planned Parenthood of Northern New England, Inc. and Planned Parenthood Federation of America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
State of New York et al v. United States Department of Health and Human Services et al
as 1:2019cv04676
Plaintiff:
STATE OF NEVADA, STATE OF MARYLAND, STATE OF CONNECTICUT and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and ALEX M. AZAR II
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Public Health Solutions, Inc., Planned Parenthood of Northern New England, Inc., Planned Parenthood Federation of America, Inc. and others
Amicus Curiae:
Institute for Policy Integrity, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, the American College of Osteopathic Obstetricians and Gynecologists and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Dr. Regina Renee Frost and Christian Medical and Dental Associations
Consolidated Defendant:
Roger Severino, Office for Civil Rights and Office for Civil Rights of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
