Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Cases 11 - 20 of 45
Imran Imon v. Keeton, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-16596
Respondent / Appellee: JASON CILIBERTI, in his official capacity as Assistant Field Office Director, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, CHUCK KEETON, in his official capacity as Warden of the La Palma Correctional Center, CESAR TOPETE, in his official capacity as Assistnat Field Office Director, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and others
Petitioner / Appellant: IMRAN HOSSAIN IMON
Linda Pehoviack v. Alex Azar, II
as 20-55841
Plaintiff / Appellant: LINDA PEHOVIACK, an individual
Defendant / Appellee: ALEX M. AZAR II, in his capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services
Rebecca Gomperts, et al v. Alex Azar, II, et al
as 20-35655
Plaintiff / Appellant: AIDACCESS, GmbH, a corporation and REBECCA GOMPERTS, Dr.
Defendant / Appellee: THOMAS CHRISTL, in his official capacity as the Former Director, Office of Drug Security, Integrity, and Response, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research and his employees, agents and successors in office, U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION, ILISA BERNSTEIN, in her official capacity as the current Acting Director, Office of Drug Security, Integrity, and Response, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research and her employees, agents and successors in office and others
State of Washington v. Alex Azar, II, et al
as 20-35521
Plaintiff / Appellee: STATE OF WASHINGTON
Defendant / Appellant: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES, ALEX M. AZAR II, in his official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services, SEEMA VERMA, in her official capacity as Administrator of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and others
State of California v. Alex Azar, II, et al
as 20-16045
Defendant / Appellant: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and ALEX M. AZAR II, in his official capacity as Secretary of the U.S Department of Health & Human Services
Plaintiff / Appellee: STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Amicus Curiae: AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF PRO-LIFE OBSTETRICIANS & GYNECOLOGISTS, AMERICAN COLLEGE OF PEDIATRICIANS, CATHOLIC MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, NATIONAL CATHOLIC BIOETHICS CENTER, AND NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF CATHOLIC NURSES, USA
Pediatric and Family Medical F v. Alex Azar, II, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-55517
Defendant / Appellee: WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General and ALEX M. AZAR II, Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Serivces
Plaintiff / Appellant: PEDIATRIC AND FAMILY MEDICAL FOUNDATION, DBA Eisner Pediatric and Family Medical Center
Arizona Health Care Cost Conta v. USHHS, et al
as 20-15598
Defendant / Appellee: ALEX M. AZAR II, Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services in his official capacity and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES, on behalf of Centers For Medicare and Medicaid Services
Plaintiff / Appellant: ARIZONA HEALTH CARE COST CONTAINMENT SYSTEM
City & County of San Francisco v. Alex Azar, II, et al
as 20-15398
Plaintiff / Appellee: CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
Defendant / Appellant: ALEX M. AZAR II, Secretary of U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and ROGER T. SEVERINO, Director, Office for Civil Rights, Department of Health and Human Services
County of Santa Clara, et al v. HHS, et al
as 20-15399
Plaintiff / Appellee: TRUST WOMEN SEATTLE, MEDICAL STUDENTS FOR CHOICE, BRADBURY-SULLIVAN LGBT COMMUNITY CENTER and others
Defendant / Appellant: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and ALEX M. AZAR II, in his official capacity as Secretary of Health and Human Services
State of Washington v. Alex Azar, II, et al
as 20-35044
Plaintiff / Appellee: STATE OF WASHINGTON
Defendant / Appellant: ALEX M. AZAR II and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?