Cases 11 - 20 of 396
Bridgett Memorial Healthcare v. Becerra
as 21-20063
Defendant / Appellee:
Alex M. Azar, II, Secretary, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Norris Cochran, Acting Secretary, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and Xavier Becerra, Secretary, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Bridgett Memorial Healthcare, doing business as Bridge Solutions
Chambless Enterprises, L.L.C. v. Rochelle Walensky
as 21-30037
Defendant / Appellee:
Alex M. Azar, II, Secretary, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, United States Department of Health and Human Services, Nina Witkofsky and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Apartment Association of Louisiana, Incorporated and Chambless Enterprises, L.L.C.
MAZON: A Jewish Response to Hunger et al v. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services et al
as 1:2021cv00475
Defendant:
Secretary of Veterans Affairs, currently Robert Wilkie, Secretary of Homeland Security, currently identified as Peter T. Gaynor in an acting capacity, Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, currently Dr. Ben Carson and others
Plaintiff:
Ark of Freedom Alliance, American Atheists, Hindu American Foundation and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
State of California, et al v. Alex Azar, II, et al
as 21-15091
Intervenor Plaintiff:
SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION LOCAL 503, CAMILLE CHRISTIAN, VIRGINIA GRANT and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, STATE OF CONNECTICUT, STATE OF ILLINOIS and others
Defendant / Appellant:
ALEX M. AZAR II and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
NOVO NORDISK INC. et al v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES et al
as 3:2021cv00806
Defendant:
ROBERT P. CHARROW, THOMAS J. ENGELS, ALEX M. AZAR, II and others
Plaintiff:
NOVO NORDISK PHARMA, INC. and NOVO NORDISK INC.
Intervenor:
ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN MEDICAL COLLEGES, 340B HEALTH, AMERICAN SOCIETY OF HEALTH-SYSTEM PHARMACISTS and others
Interested Party:
ACTING U.S. AG JEFFREY A. ROSEN and U.S. ATTORNEY OFFICE FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2005
PLANNED PARENTHOOD SOUTHEAST, INC et al v. AZAR et al
as 1:2021cv00117
Defendant:
ALEX M. AZAR, II, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, SEEMA VERMA and others
Plaintiff:
PLANNED PARENTHOOD SOUTHEAST, INC and FEMINIST WOMEN'S HEALTH CENTER
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S., LLC v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES et al
as 3:2021cv00634
Defendant:
ROBERT P. CHARROW, THOMAS J. ENGELS, ALEX M. AZAR II and others
Plaintiff:
SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S., LLC
Amicus Curiae:
ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN MEDICAL COLLEGES, NOVO NORDISK INC., AMERICAN SOCIETY OF HEALTH-SYSTEM PHARMACISTS and others
Intervenor:
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF CHILDREN'S HOSPITALS d/b/a CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY et al v. HEALTH RESOURCES AND SERVICES ADMINISTRATION, et al
as 1:2021cv00081
Defendant:
ROBERT P. CHARROW, THOMAS J. ENGELS, ALEX M. AZAR, II and others
Plaintiff:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY and LILLY USA, LLC
Intervenor:
The Children's Hospital Association, 340B HEALTH, THEAMERICIAN HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION and others
Amicus Curiae:
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS, LITTLE RIVERS HEALTH CARE INC, RYAN WHITE CLINICS FOR 340B ACCESS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
PHARMACEUTICAL CARE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES et al
as 1:2021cv00095
Defendant:
ALEX M. AZAR, II, JEFFREY A. ROSEN, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and others
Plaintiff:
PHARMACEUTICAL CARE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP v. Azar et al
as 1:2021cv00027
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Robert P. Charrow, Thomas J. Engels and others
Plaintiff:
AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
