Cases 31 - 40 of 76
American Academy of Pediatrics v. American E-Liquid
as 19-2132
Not Yet Classified:
RIGHT TO BE SMOKE-FREE COALITION, MARYLAND VAPOR ALLIANCE, IOWANS FOR ALTERNATIVE TO SMOKING AND TOBACCO and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION, AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR RESPIRATORY CARE, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
LEAH BRASCH, AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION, AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY CANCER ACTION NETWORK and others
Lane v. Azar et al
as 1:2019cv03183
Plaintiff:
D.P.M. Craig R. Lane and Craig R. Lane
Defendant:
Alex M Azar, II, JOANNE CHIEDI and Alex Azar
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2019cv02993
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
FORSYTH MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, INC. v. AZAR
as 1:2019cv00257
Defendant:
ALEX M. AZAR, II
Plaintiff:
FORSYTH MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 7422
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2019cv02734
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 ed
Brier Creek Integrated Pain & Spine PLLC v. United States Department of Health & Human Services et al
as 5:2019cv00300
Defendant:
Alex M. Azar, II, United States Department of the Treasury, Steve Mnuchin and others
Plaintiff:
Brier Creek Integrated Pain & Spine PLLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
Greene v. Azar et al
as 8:2019cv02211
Defendant:
Alex M. Azar, II and Abel Capetillo
Plaintiff:
Harold Greene
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2019cv01859
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hinkle v. Azar
as 5:2019cv00595
Defendant:
Alex M. Azar, II
Plaintiff:
Lawrence E. Hinkle and Bryan Hinkle
Cook v. Azar
as 5:2019cv00594
Plaintiff:
Edith Cook and Earl Cook
Defendant:
Alex M. Azar, II
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
