Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 12,288
Angela Cole, et al v. Quest Diagnostics Inc
as 25-1219
Plaintiff: ANGELA COLE, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Petitioner: BEATRICE ROCHE, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant: QUEST DIAGNOSTICS INC
International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers v. Deloitte & Touche LLP
as 25-1146
Plaintiff: INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS LOCAL 98 PENSION FUND, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated
Defendant: DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP and DELOITTE LLP
Moreau v. Harrison County
as 25-20045
Plaintiff: Lynwood Moreau, Jeffrey Stauber, Individually and on Behalf of all others Similarly Situated, Edward Lopez and others
Defendant: Harrison County, Texas
Hoch, et al. v. Figs, Inc., et al.
as 25-902
Plaintiff: RONALD HOCH, Dr., PENSACOLA POLICE OFFICERS' RETIREMENT PLAN, CITY OF WARREN POLICE AND FIRE RETIREMENT SYSTEM and others
Defendant: FIGS, INC., HEATHER HASSON, CATHERINE SPEAR and others
Pessin v. JPMorgan Chase U.S. Benefits Executive
as 25-309
Plaintiff: JOSEPH PESSIN, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
Defendant: JPMORGAN CHASE U.S. BENEFITS EXECUTIVE, as Plan Administrator of the JPMorgan Chase Retirement Plan, BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF JPMORGAN CHASE BANK AND J.P. MORGAN CHASE AND COMPANY and JPMORGAN CHASE RETIREMENT PLAN
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 25-1208
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Dukes v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc.
as 25-889
Plaintiff: MELONIECE M. DUKES, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated also known as Meloniece Dukes
Defendant: EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2025cv01125
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1601 Truth in Lending
Hellers Gas Maryland, Inc. v. Mikhail Gorney
as 25-113
Petitioner: HELLERS GAS MARYLAND, INC. and HELLER'S GAS, INC.
Respondent: MIKHAIL GORNEY, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Michael Fiorito v. The Prodigal Company
as 25-1268
Plaintiff: Michael Fiorito, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant: The Prodigal Company

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?