Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 36
Carolina Youth Action Project v. Alan Wilson We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-2166
Plaintiff / Appellee: CAROLINA YOUTH ACTION PROJECT, D.S., by and through her next of kin Juanita Ford, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated and S.P., by and through her next of kin Melissa Downs, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated
Plaintiff: NIYA KENNY, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated and TAUREAN NESMITH, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellant: ALAN WILSON, in his official capacity as Attorney General of South Carolina
Defendant: J. ALTON CANNON, JR., in his official capacity as the Sheriff of Charleston County, SC; on behalf of himself and others similarly situated, LUTHER T. REYNOLDS, in his official capacity as the Chief of the Police Department of the City of Charleston, SC, REGINALD L. BURGESS, in his official capacity as the Chief of the Police Department of the City of North Charleston, SC and others
Smith v. Charleston County Sheriff's Office et al
as 2:2020cv03881
Plaintiff: Richard Smith
Defendant: Charleston County Sheriff's Office, Deputy William Shepherd and Sheriff James Alton Cannon, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Protection and Advocacy for People with Disabilities Inc v. Cannon et al
as 2:2020cv02738
Defendant: Mitch Lucas, James Alton Cannon, Jr, Willis Beatty and others
Plaintiff: Protection and Advocacy for People with Disabilities Inc
Amicus Curiae: United States
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Early v. Cannon et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2019cv02846
Defendant: James Alton Cannon, Jr and Joyce Monts
Plaintiff: Jacques Early
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company v. Necco Holding Company I, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2018cv00847
Defendant: Necco Operating Company I, LLC, Travis Embry-Martin, Alton Cannon and others
Plaintiff: Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Type: Contract Insurance
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv01152
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Niya Kenny v. Alan Wilson We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-1367
Plaintiff - Appellant: NIYA KENNY, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, TAUREAN NESMITH, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, GIRLS ROCK CHARLESTON, INCORPORATED, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant - Appellee: ALAN WILSON, in his official capacity as Attorney General of South Carolina, on behalf of himself and others similarly situated, J. ALTON CANNON, JR., in his official capacity as the Sheriff of Charleston County, SC; on behalf of himself and others similarly situated, GREGORY G. MULLEN, in his official capacity as the Chief of the Police Department of the City of Charleston, SC; on behalf of himself and others similarly situated and others
Kenny et al v. Wilson et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2016cv02794
Plaintiff: Niya Kenny , Taurean Nesmith , Girls Rock Charleston Inc and others
Defendant: Alan Wilson , J Alton Cannon, Jr , Gregory G Mullen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GRANT v. CHARLESTON COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2016cv02505
Plaintiff: LEVELL L. GRANT
Defendant: Charleston County Sheriff's Department, JAMES ALTON CANNON, JR. and Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GRANT v. CHARLESTON COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT
as 1:2016cv00834
Plaintiff: LEVELL L. GRANT
Defendant: CHARLESTON COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, JAMES ALTON CANNON, JR. and WILSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?