Cases 1 - 8 of 8
LANCASTER v. ALVEREZ
as 1:2024cv04368
Defendant:
JORGE ALVEREZ and JORGE ALVAREZ SANTA CRUZ
Plaintiff:
NAKIA LANCASTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
GRAHAM v. ALVEREZ et al
as 2:2019cv09364
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER GRAHAM
Defendant:
CO SANCHEZ, NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JOHN DOE 1-20 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LANKFORD v. CITY OF CLIFTON, et al
as 2:2018cv06643
Plaintiff:
JAQUICE LANKFORD
Defendant:
CITY OF CLIFTON, CLIFTON POLICE DEPARTMENT , ALAN ALAN FIORILLA and others
Cross_claimant:
ALAN ALAN FIORILLA , CLIFTON POLICE DEPARTMENT , JUAN VELEZ and others
Cross_defendant:
ALAN ALAN FIORILLA , THOMAS BUELL, JUAN VELEZ and others
Counter_claimant:
ALAN ALAN FIORILLA , CLIFTON POLICE DEPARTMENT and JUAN VELEZ
Counter_defendant:
JAQUICE LANKFORD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAILEY v. EMPLOYEES OF CLIFTON TWP. MUNICIPAL COURT et al
as 2:2017cv04283
Plaintiff:
ISHTAR JAHNIL BAILEY
Defendant:
EMPLOYEES OF CLIFTON TWP. MUNICIPAL COURT and ALVEREZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
FERNANDEZ v. WRIGHT et al
as 2:2015cv07309
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY FERNANDEZ
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER WRIGHT, HAMPTON, J. HANCOCK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MASSEY v. HENDRICKS et al
as 2:2015cv03613
Plaintiff:
KEITH R. MASSEY
Defendant:
ROY L. HENDRICKS, KELLY, MICHAEL OJELADE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ABDUL-AZIZ v. THE CITY OF ELIZABETH N.J. POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2014cv07675
Plaintiff:
MR. ABDUL-AZIZ
Defendant:
THE CITY OF ELIZABETH N.J. POLICE DEPARTMENT, JAMES COSGROVE, LINDA LENSCH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
AZIZ v. ELIZABETH POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2014cv07296
Plaintiff:
ABDUL AZIZ
Defendant:
ELIZABETH POLICE DEPARTMENT, HUMBERTO ALVEREZ, PAUL MCCRAE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
