Cases 21 - 30 of 37
Robert Lippert v. Ramond Caballos-Galendo, et al
as 21-35222
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN DOE, 3, an unidentified state official at ISCC, IDAHO STATE CORRECTIONAL CENTER, ISCC, JOHN DOE, 2, state official at ISCC also known as Sergeant Host and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT SCOTT LIPPERT, AKA Robert Scott
Lippert v. Caballos-Galendo et al
as 2:2021cv00175
Defendant:
John Doe 2, Idaho State Corrections Center, Sergeant Host and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Scott Lippert
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wolf v. Idaho State Bd. of Corr., et al
as 20-35600
Defendant / Appellee:
JEREMY HRANAC, IDAHO STATE BOARD OF CORRECTION, SUSAN WESSLESS and others
Defendant:
LEROY PENAKU
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANDREW J.J. WOLF
Bergstrom v. Corizon LLC et al
as 1:2020cv00267
Plaintiff:
Christina Bergstrom and Stacie Dye
Defendant:
Corizon LLC, John/Jane Does, Amy Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Wolf v. Tewalt, et al.
as 1:2020cv00259
Defendant:
Gary Hartgrove, Ashley Dowell, Randy Valley and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew J.J. Wolf
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carr v. Page et al
as 1:2020cv00146
Defendant:
B. Phillips, Jay Christensen, Lt. Nicodemus and others
Plaintiff:
Jody Carr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lippert v. Christensen et al
as 1:2020cv00118
Defendant:
Sgt. Hurst, Christensen, Amanda Gentry and others
Plaintiff:
Robert S. Lippert
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wolf v. Idaho State Board of Correction, et al.
as 1:2020cv00025
Plaintiff:
Andrew J.J. Wolf
Defendant:
Walter Campbell, Mark Way, Director IDOC Josh Tewalt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pamela Pringle v. Brent Cardall, et al
as 19-16914
Defendant / Appellee:
BRENT CARDALL, SANDY JONES, COUNTY OF YOLO and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAMELA DENISE PRINGLE
Pringle v. Gentry et al
as 1:2018cv00347
Defendant:
Cindy McDonald, Judy Mesick, Shannon Cluney and others
Plaintiff:
Pamela Denise Pringle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
