Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Morrison v. Tewalt
as 1:2023cv00191
Plaintiff:
Johnothon Morrison
Defendant:
Director IDOC Josh Tewalt, Judge B. Lynn Winmill, Judge David C. Nye and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carr v. Tewalt, et al.
as 1:2022cv00200
Plaintiff:
Jody Carr
Defendant:
John Tewalt, Chad Page, Amanda Gentry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carr et al v. Tewalt et al
as 1:2021cv00409
Plaintiff:
Jody Carr and Double Celled Close Custody Inmates of IDOC
Defendant:
Director IDOC Josh Tewalt, Chad Page, Amanda Gentry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lopez v. Tewalt, et al.
as 1:2021cv00255
Plaintiff:
John R Lopez
Defendant:
Jay Christensen, Lt. Nicodemus, Timothy McKay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wolf v. Tewalt, et al.
as 1:2021cv00226
Defendant:
J. Does #1-2, Randy Valley, Susan Wessels and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew J.J. Wolf
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lippert v. Caballos-Galendo et al
as 1:2021cv00149
Defendant:
John Doe 2, Idaho State Corrections Center, Ramond Caballos-Galendo and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Scott Lippert
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wolf v. Tewalt, et al.
as 1:2020cv00259
Defendant:
Gary Hartgrove, Ashley Dowell, Randy Valley and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew J.J. Wolf
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carr v. Page et al
as 1:2020cv00146
Defendant:
B. Phillips, Jay Christensen, Lt. Nicodemus and others
Plaintiff:
Jody Carr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lippert v. Christensen et al
as 1:2020cv00118
Defendant:
Sgt. Hurst, Christensen, Amanda Gentry and others
Plaintiff:
Robert S. Lippert
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wolf v. Idaho State Board of Correction, et al.
as 1:2020cv00025
Plaintiff:
Andrew J.J. Wolf
Defendant:
Walter Campbell, Mark Way, Director IDOC Josh Tewalt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.