Cases 21 - 30 of 52
Miller v. City of Cordova, Alabama et al
as 6:2017cv00241
Plaintiff:
Erin Amanda Miller
Defendant:
City of Cordova, Alabama , Aaron Moseley , Bradley Grace and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rogers v. United States et al
as 1:2016cv00425
Plaintiff:
Anthony Lee Rogers
Defendant:
United States , Tina Nommay, Thomas O'Malley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2016cv02154
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Miller v. Cordova, Alabama, City of et al
as 6:2016cv00716
Plaintiff:
Erin Amanda Miller
Defendant:
Aaron Moseley, Bradley Grace, Bobby Busby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Loos, Pam v. Reichert, Thomas et al
as 3:2016cv00287
Plaintiff:
Pam Loos
Defendant:
Thomas Reichert , Theodre Ashbeck, Jr. , Micahel Malooly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rogers - RESTRICTED - ACCEPT NO DOCUMENTS v. United States et al
as 1:2016cv00018
Plaintiff:
Anthony Lee Rogers
Defendant:
United States , Tina Nommay, Thomas O'Malley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Miller v. Colvin
as 1:2015cv02099
Plaintiff:
Amanda Miller
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Papillion et al v. Union Pacific Railroad Co
as 6:2014cv02547
Plaintiff:
Joseph L Papillion , Jaelto Papillion , Jaeda Papillion and others
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Miller et al v. Town of Mounds
as 4:2014cv00277
Plaintiff:
Amanda Miller and Debra Reavis
Defendant:
Town of Mounds
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tracy v. NVR, Inc.
as 14-609
Plaintiff:
Thomas Gorczyca, Lisa Rybarczyk, Robert Marcello and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Peter Gavin, K. Maura Mueller and Patrick Tracy, on behalf of himself and all other employees similarly situated
Petitioner:
William Mix and James Hutt, IV
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant:
Christine Giambrone
Defendant - Appellee:
NVR, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
