Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Urban View Development Group, Inc. et al v. GoDaddy.Com, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv00738
Plaintiff:
Urban View Development Group, Inc., Nadav Hamo and Robert Michaeli
Defendant:
GoDaddy.Com, LLC, Amazon Web Services, Inc. and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Liberty Mutual Insurance Company v. Amazon Web Services, Inc.
as 2:2021cv02549
Defendant:
Amazon Web Services, Inc., Amazon.com, Inc. and Amazon
Plaintiff:
Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Mallh et al v. Capital One Financial Corporation et al
as 1:2019cv05040
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Quintevis and Victor Mallh
Defendant:
AMAZON WEB SERVICES, INC., CAPITAL ONE BANK (USA), N.A., AMAZON.COM, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Hun v. Capital One Financial Corporation et al
as 1:2019cv04436
Defendant:
Amazon Web Services, Inc. and Capital One Financial Corporation
Plaintiff:
Alexander Hun
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Electrical Inspectors, Inc. et al v. NameCheap, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv05800
Plaintiff:
New York Board of Fire Underwriters, Electrical Inspectors, Inc. and New York Board of Fire Underwriters, Inc.
Defendant:
Amazon Web Services, Amazon.com, Inc., NameCheap, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
C.D.S. Inc. v. Zetler
as 18-1318
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant - Appellee:
C.D.S. Inc.
Defendant-Counter-Claimant - Appellant:
Bradley Zetler, CDS, LLC and Rapid Systems CC
Defendant - Appellee:
Diane Treat, Christophe Racle, CDS SARL and others
Defendant:
John Does 1-5, Amazon Web Services, Inc. and Rackspace US, Inc.
CafeX Communications Inc. v. Amazon Web Services, Inc.
as 1:2017cv01349
Plaintiff:
CafeX Communications Inc.
Defendant:
Amazon Web Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
