Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Amelia Perez et al v. Goodleap, LLC et al
as 5:2024cv00075
Plaintiff:
Amelia Perez and Daniel Perez
Defendant:
Goodleap, LLC and Does 1 through 20, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv01881
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Perez et al v. Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation et al
as 4:2017cv03609
Defendant:
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation and Bank of America, N.A.
Plaintiff:
Raul Perez and Amelia Perez
Counter_claimant:
Bank of America, N.A.
Counter_defendant:
Amelia Perez and Raul Perez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States of America et al v. Perez
as 3:2012cv00516
Plaintiff:
United States of America and Roy Everidge
Defendant:
Amelia Perez
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402
Perez et al v. JPMorgan Chase Bank et al
as 3:2011cv03602
Plaintiff:
Amelia Perez and Constantino Perez, Jr.
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank , California Reconveyance Company and LaSalle Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Perez et al v. JPMorgan Chase Bank et al
as 4:2011cv03602
Plaintiff:
Amelia Perez and Constantino Perez, Jr.
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank , California Reconveyance Company and LaSalle Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Perez et al v. JPMorgan Chase Bank et al
as 4:2011cv03602
Plaintiff:
Amelia Perez and Constantino Perez, Jr.
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank , California Reconveyance Company and LaSalle Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv06800
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Perez De Acosta v. United States Of America
as 3:2010cv00010
Plaintiff:
Amelia Perez De Acosta
Defendant:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
