Cases 1 - 10 of 312
AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION v. EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT et al
as 1:2025cv01888
Plaintiff:
American Bar Association
Defendant:
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Pamela Bondi, in her official capacity as Attorney General of the United States and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Carroll et al v. Steptoe & Johnson PLLC et al
as 1:2025cv00053
Plaintiff:
Leonard Carroll and Stephanie Carroll
Defendant:
Steptoe & Johnson PLLC, American Bar Association, Federal Bar Association and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Interstate Commerce Act
Moose et al v. Health and Human Services of the United States
as 2:2025cv00455
Plaintiff:
Steven Bradley Moose, Tiana Balchunas, Brigette Villarreal and others
Defendant:
Health and Human Services of the United States, The Supreme Court of the United States, U.S. Department of Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Alexandra M. Dean et al v. Health and Human Services of the United States et al
as 2:2025cv04970
Plaintiff:
Alexandra M. Dean, Brigette Villarreal, Karina Paredes and others
Defendant:
Health and Human Services of the United States, The Supreme Court of the United States, U.S. Department of Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Hermosillo v. Barnes III et al
as 3:2025cv00142
Plaintiff:
James J Hermosillo
Defendant:
Austin B. Barnes III, Suzanne M. Godenswager, Sandhu Law Group LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2025cv01263
Plaintiff:
AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, PAMELA J. BONDI and TODD BLANCHE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
American Alliance For Equal Rights v. American Bar Association
as 1:2025cv03980
Plaintiff:
American Alliance For Equal Rights
Defendant:
American Bar Association
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
New Hampshire Indonesian Community Support, et al v. Trump, et al
as 25-1348
Plaintiff:
NEW HAMPSHIRE INDONESIAN COMMUNITY SUPPORT, LEAGUE OF UNITED LATIN AMERICAN CITIZENS and MAKE THE ROAD NEW YORK
Defendant:
DONALD J. TRUMP, President of the United States, in their official capacity, US DEPT. OF HOMELAND SECURITY, KRISTI NOEM, in their official capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security and others
Interested Party:
LOCAL GOVERNMENTS AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS, GUN OWNERS OF AMERICA, INC., AMERICA'S FUTURE and others
Amicus Curiae:
FRED T. KOREMATSU CENTER FOR LAW AND EQUALITY, ASIAN AMERICAN LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATION FUND, CENTER FOR CIVIL RIGHTS AND CRITICAL JUSTICE and others
Petitioner:
ERIKA LEE, PAUL FINKELMAN and GABRIEL JACKSON CHIN
Global Health Council, et al v. Donald J. Trump, et al
as 25-5097
Plaintiff:
Global Health Council, Small Business Association for International Companies, HIAS and others
Defendant:
Donald J. Trump, in his official capacity as President of the United States of America, Marco Rubio, in his official capacity as Secretary of State and Acting Administrator of the United States Agency for International Development, Peter Marocco, in his official capacity as Acting Deputy Administrator for Policy and Planning, Acting Deputy Administrator for Management and Resources of the United States Agency for International Development, and Director of Foreign Assistance at and others
Amicus Curiae:
State of Ohio, State of South Carolina, State of Alabama and others
La Union del Pueblo Entero v. Abbott
as 25-50246
Plaintiff:
La Union del Pueblo Entero, Southwest Voter Registration Education Project, Mexican American Bar Association of Texas and others
Defendant:
Gregory W. Abbott, in his official capacity as Governor of Texas, Jane Nelson, in her official capacity as Texas Secretary of State, State of Texas and others
Movant:
Republican National Committee
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
