Cases filed in California
Cases 1 - 10 of 10
American Academy of Pediatrics v. Online Training Center LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv01685
Plaintiff: American Association of Pediatrics and American Academy of Pediatrics
Defendant: Online Training Center LLC doing business as National CPR Association, Arielle Daniels and Online Training LLC doing business as National CPR Association
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company et al v. Becerra et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv01990
Defendant: Xavier Becerra and Summer Stephan
Plaintiff: Neighborhood Market Association, Inc., R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, Philip Morris USA Inc. and others
Petitioner: Mental and Public Health Organizations
Amicus Curiae: Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids, American Lung Association, African American Tobacco Control Leadership Council and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Creation of a Remedy - Declaration of Rights
R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company et al v. County of San Diego et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv01290
Defendant: Helen N. Robbins-Meyer and County of San Diego
Plaintiff: R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, R.J. Reynolds Vapor Company and Santa Fe Natural Tobacco Company, Inc.
Amicus Curiae: Public Health Law Center, African American Tobacco Control Leadership Council, American Lung Association and others
Petitioner: Mental and Public Health Organizations
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
State of California et al v. Kevin K. McAleenan
as 2:2019cv07390
Plaintiff: District of Columbia, State of Minnesota, Commonwealth of Virginia and others
Defendant: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Alex M. Azar, II, U.S. Department of Homeland Security and others
Amicus Curiae: Save the Children Federation, Inc., American Medical Association, First Focus on Children and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
La Clinica De La Raza et al v. Trump et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2019cv04980
Defendant: United States Department of Homeland Security, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Kenneth T. Cuccinelli and others
Plaintiff: Maternal and Child Health Access, Central American Resource Center, Legal Aid Society of San Mateo County and others
Amicus Curiae: GLBTQ Legal Advocates & Defenders (GLAD), Japanese American Citizens League (JACL), MinKwon Center for Community Action and others
Petitioner: Community Healthcare Network, Presidents' Alliance on Higher Education and Immigration, America's Essential Hospitals and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
State of California et al v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2019cv04975
Plaintiff: District of Columbia, State of Maine, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and others
Defendant: U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Kenneth T. Cuccinelli, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services and others
Amicus Curiae: GLBTQ Legal Advocates & Defenders (GLAD), Japanese American Citizens League (JACL), Women Lawyers on Guard Inc. and others
Petitioner: Community Healthcare Network, Presidents' Alliance on Higher Education and Immigration, Center for Public Representation and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
City and County of San Francisco et al v. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2019cv04717
Plaintiff: City and County of San Francisco and County of Santa Clara
Defendant: Acting Secretary of Kevin McAleenen, Department of Homeland Security, Acting Director Kenneth T. Cuccinelli and others
Petitioner: Community Healthcare Network, Presidents' Alliance on Higher Education and Immigration, America's Essential Hospitals and others
Amicus Curiae: The Cities of Los Angeles and Oakland, California; Harris County, Texas; and 26 Additional Cities, Counties, and Local Government Agencies, City of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, City of Seattle, Washington and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
State of California v. Azar et al Featured Case
as 3:2019cv01184
Defendant: Alex Azar, Health and Human Services, Secretary and U.S. Department of Health & Human Services
Plaintiff: State of California Attorney General's Office and State of California
Petitioner: Essential Access Health, Inc., Chris Sevier and Dr. Melissa Marshall, M.D.
Amicus Curiae: American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, American College of Physicians, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Essential Access Health, Inc. et al v. Azar II et al
as 3:2019cv01195
Plaintiff: Essential Access Health, Inc. and Melissa Marshall, M.D.
Defendant: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and Alex M. Azar II
Amicus Curiae: American College of Physicians, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Perry et al v. Schwarzenegger et al Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2009cv02292
Plaintiff: Kristin M. Perry, Sandra B. Stier, Paul T. Katami and others
Intervenor: Our Family Coalition, Lavender Seniors of the East Bay, Parents, Families, and Friends of Lesbians and Gays and others
Defendant: Arnold Schwarzenegger, Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Mark B. Horton and others
Respondent: William T. Criswell
Not Yet Classified: Proposition 8 Official Proponents, Dennis Hollingsworth, Gail J. Knight and others
3Rd Party Defendant: Californians Against Eliminating Basic Rights
Interested Party: Media Coalition
Not Classified By Court: Doug Swardstrom, Honorable Vaughn R. Walker, James L Garlow and others
Amicus Curiae: City and County of San Francisco, ACLU Foundation of Northern California, Equality California and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?