Cases 1 - 10 of 28
In re: Mary Carr, et al v. Google LLC, et al
as 23-15285
Not Classified By Court:
In re: GOOGLE PLAY STORE ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MARY CARR, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, DIANNE BENTLEY, JENNIFER GRACE and others
Defendant / Appellant:
GOOGLE LLC, GOOGLE IRELAND LIMITED, GOOGLE COMMERCE LIMITED and others
Intervenor:
AMAZON.COM LLC
Amicus Curiae:
ATLANTIC LEGAL FOUNDATION, WASHINGTON LEGAL FOUNDATION, BUSINESS AND ANTITRUST LAW PROFESSORS and others
Stephanie Turner v. McDonald's USA LLC, et al
as 22-2334
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STEPHANIE TURNER, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee:
MCDONALD'S USA LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and MCDONALD'S CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF ILLINOIS, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, STATE OF COLORADO and others
Epic Games, Inc. v. Apple, Inc.
as 21-16695
Plaintiff:
EPIC GAMES, INC.
Counter Claimant:
APPLE, INC.
Amicus Curiae:
TILE, MATCH GROUP, INC., BASECAMP and others
Epic Games, Inc. v. Apple, Inc.
as 21-16506
Appellant:
EPIC GAMES, INC.
Counter Claimant:
APPLE, INC.
Amicus Curiae:
38 LAW, ECONOMICS, AND BUSINESS PROFESSORS, TILE, COMMITTEE TO SUPPORT THE ANTITRUST LAWS and others
Relevent Sports, LLC v. United States Soccer Federatio
as 21-2088
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Relevent Sports, LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
United States Soccer Federation, Inc. and Federation Internationale de Football Association
Amicus Curiae:
United States of America, William W. Berry, III, Montague Professor of Law at the University of Mississippi School of Law., Aaron Edlin, Richard W. Jennings Professor of Law and Professor of Economics at the University of California, Berkeley. and others
Apple Inc. v. Corellium, Inc.
as 21-12835
Plaintiff / Appellant:
APPLE, INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
CORELLIUM, LLC and CORELLIUM, INC.
Amicus Curiae:
RALPH OMAN, ELECTRONIC FRONTIER FOUNDATION, CASEY ELLIS and others
State of New York, et al v. Meta Platforms, Inc.
as 21-7078
Plaintiff / Appellant:
State of New York, District of Columbia, State of California and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Facebook, Inc. and Meta Platforms, Inc.
Amicus Curiae:
United States of America, American Antitrust Institute, Committee to Support the Antitrust Laws and others
In re: Google Play Store Antitrust Litigation
as 3:2021md02981
Defendant:
Alphabet Inc., Google Payment Corp., Google Commerce Limited and others
Plaintiff:
Jared Stark, Ashly Esquivel, Robert Wing and others
Counter Defendant:
Epic Games, Inc., Match Group, LLC and Humor Rainbow, Inc.
Counter Claimant:
Google LLC and Google Asia Pacific PTE. Limited
Not Classified By Court:
Activision Blizzard, Inc., Niantic, Inc., Big Fish Games and others
Amicus Curiae:
American Antitrust Institute and Economists Supporting Dr. Rysman as Proposed Amici
3Rd Party Defendant:
Riot Games, Inc.
Interested Party:
Valve Corporation, Nintendo of America Inc., Police and Fire Retirement System of the City of Detroit and others
Petitioner:
Amazon.com LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. GOOGLE LLC
as 1:2020cv03010
Plaintiff:
STATE OF ARKANSAS, STATE OF LOUISIANA, STATE OF FLORIDA and others
Defendant:
GOOGLE LLC
Not Classified By Court:
STATE OF MICHIGAN and STATE OF CALIFORNIA
3Rd Party Defendant:
NBCUNIVERSAL MEDIA, LLC, COMCAST CORPORATION and SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.
Petitioner:
AMAZON.COM, INC., APPLE INC., DUCK DUCK GO, INC. and others
Respondent:
BOOKING HOLDINGS INC. and YELP INC.
Interested Party:
STATE OF WASHINGTON
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Association for Accessible Medicines v. Becerra
as 2:2020cv01708
Defendant:
Xavier Becerra
Plaintiff:
Association for Accessible Medicines
Amicus Curiae:
Public Citizen, Inc., Consumer Reports, Inc. and American Antitrust Institute
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
