Cases 1 - 10 of 16
State of Georgia, et al v. President of the United States, et al
as 21-14269
Plaintiff / Appellee:
STATE OF GEORGIA, STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF IDAHO and others
Defendant / Appellant:
PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, SAFER FEDERAL WORKFORCE TASK FORCE, UNITED STATES OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT and others
Amicus Curiae:
AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ALLERGY, ASTHMA & IMMUNOLOGY, AMERICAN ACADEMY OF FAMILY PHYSICIANS, AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS and others
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE and AMERICAN PSYCHIATRICS INSTITUTE
KY, et al v. Joseph Biden, et al
as 21-6147
Plaintiff / Appellee:
COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY, STATE OF OHIO, STATE OF TENNESSEE and others
Defendant / Appellant:
JOSEPH R. BIDEN, in his official capacity as President of the United States, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, SAFER FEDERAL WORKFORCE TASK FORCE and others
Amicus Curiae:
AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, AMERICAN COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS, AMERICAN ACADEMY OF FAMILY PHYSICIANS and others
State of Missouri, et al v. Joseph Biden, Jr., et al
as 21-3725
Plaintiff / Appellee:
State of Missouri, State of Nebraska, State of Arkansas and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Joseph R. Biden, Jr., in his official capacity as the President of the United States of America, United States of America, United States Department of Health and Human Services and others
Amicus Curiae:
Reliant Care Management Company, L.L.C.
Appellant:
American Academy of Family Physicians, American Academy of Pediatrics, American College of Chest Physicians and others
State of Texas v. USA
as 19-10011
Plaintiff / Appellee:
STATE OF TENNESSEE, STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA, STATE OF LOUISIANA and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, STATE OF CONNECTICUT, STATE OF MINNESOTA and others
Defendant / Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and others
Intervenor:
STATE OF COLORADO, STATE OF IOWA, UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES and others
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF OHIO, 483 FEDERALLY RECOGNIZED TRIBAL NATIONS, ILYA SOMIN and others
Not Classified By Court:
FOUNDATION FOR MORAL LAW
PUBLIC SERVICE INSURANCE COMPANY v. JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. et al
as 2:2019cv05904
Defendant:
BEVERLY SACKLER, ENDO HEALTH SOLUTIONS, INC., ACTAVIS KADIAN LLC and others
Plaintiff:
PUBLIC SERVICE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Public Service Insurance Company v. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 1:2020op45015
Defendant:
Beverly Sackler, Richard S. Sackler, Actavis Kadian LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Public Service Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
People of the State of Illinois et al v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 1:2019op45657
Defendant:
Abbott Laboratories, Janssen Pharmaceutica Inc., Purdue Pharma L.P. and others
Plaintiff:
People of State of Illinois and Williamson County, Illinois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
People of the State of Illinois et al v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 3:2019cv00682
Plaintiff:
The People of the State of Illinois, Williamson County, Illinois and People of State of Illinois
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, American Pain Society, Abbott Laboratories and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Illinois Public Risk Fund v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 1:2019cv03210
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Endo Health Solutions, Inc., Purdue Pharma L.P. and others
Plaintiff:
Illinois Public Risk Fund
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Local 150 International Union of Operating Engineers, et al v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 1:2019op45414
Defendant:
Janssen Pharmaceutica Inc., Endo Health Solutions, Inc., Purdue Pharma L.P. and others
Plaintiff:
Chicago Regional Council of Carpenters, Midwest Operating Engineers Health and Welfare Fund, International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 150 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
