Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Federal Insurance Company v. Caldera Medical, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv00393
Defendant:
Caldera Medical, Inc, Sybil Washington, Brenda Deyo and others
Plaintiff:
Federal Insurance Company
Petitioner:
Karen S Arnold
Not Classified By Court:
Ruth Barry
Intervenor Plaintiff:
American Medical Systems, Inc. and Encision, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
Wave Form Systems, Inc. v. AMS Sales Corporation et al
as 0:2014cv03976
Plaintiff:
Wave Form Systems, Inc.
Defendant:
AMS Sales Corporation and American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sabotnik v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 1:2012cv07121
Plaintiff:
Christy Sabotnik
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Prall v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 8:2007cv01795
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Prall
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Declaratory Judgment
American Medical Systems, Inc v. Zylstra et al
as 0:2007cv04020
Plaintiff:
American Medical Systems, Inc, American Medical Systems, Inc and American Medical Systems, Inc
Defendant:
Peter Zylstra, Ken Prall and biolitec, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Zylstra v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 1:2007cv02294
Plaintiff:
Peter Zylstra
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc., American Medical Systems, Inc., American Medical Systems, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Davanzia, S.L. v. Laserscope, Inc. et al
as 5:2007cv00247
Plaintiff:
Davanzia, S.L. and Davanzia, S.L.
Defendant:
Laserscope, Inc., Laserscope, Inc., Laserscope, Inc. and others
Mediator:
Geoff Howard
Counter-claimant:
Laserscope, Inc., Laserscope, Inc. and Laserscope, Inc.
Counter-defendant:
Davanzia, S.L. and Davanzia, S.L.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
