Cases 1 - 10 of 10
James Dawson v. Rod Boyd, et al
as 21-2567
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES D. DAWSON
Defendant / Appellee:
ROD BOYD, THOMAS HENDRICKS, Sergeant, SARAH CRABTREE, Sergeant and others
James Dawson v. Rod Boyd, et al
as 21-1506
Defendant / Appellee:
CODY CURRY, JACOB HUSKINS, Corretional Officer, THOMAS HENDRICKS, Sergeant and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES D. DAWSON
Young v. Logan County et al
as 3:2020cv03162
Plaintiff:
Adam Young
Defendant:
Mark Landers, Rod Boyd, Advanced Correctional Healthcare and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allsebrooke v. Logan County et al
as 3:2020cv03133
Plaintiff:
Jason Allsebrooke
Defendant:
Mark Landers, Advanced Correctional Healthcare, Rachel King and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dawson v. Byod et al
as 3:2020cv03134
Defendant:
Thomas Hendricks, Rode Byod, Jacob Huskins and others
Plaintiff:
James Dumar Dawson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morse v. Neitzel et al
as 3:2020cv03129
Defendant:
. Lochard, Jakob Huskins, Katie Hoban and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon Morse
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Trail v. Woodrum et al
as 3:2020cv03076
Defendant:
Advanced Correctional Healthcare, Inc., Amy Woodrum, County of Logan and others
Plaintiff:
Tyler Trail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nicholas v. County of Logan et al
as 3:2020cv03069
Defendant:
County of Logan, Mark Landers, Advanced Correctional Healthcare and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Jason Nicholas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Nicholas v. Logan County Jail et al
as 3:2020cv03066
Plaintiff:
Richard J Nicholas
Defendant:
Logan County Jail, Mark Landers, Advanced Correctional Healthcare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Nicholas v. County of Logan et al
as 3:2020cv03056
Defendant:
County of Logan, Mark Landers, Advanced Correctional Healthcare and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Jason Nicholas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
