Cases 1 - 10 of 48
AIT WORLDWIDE LOGISTICS, INC., v. Amyris, Inc.
as 1:2023cv01708
Plaintiff:
AIT WORLDWIDE LOGISTICS, INC.,
Defendant:
Amyris, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Disruptional Ltd. et al v. Amyris, Inc.
as 1:2023cv02245
Plaintiff:
Disruptional Ltd. and &Vest Beauty Labs LP
Defendant:
Amyris, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Amyris Clean Beauty, Inc. et al v. Nababy LLC et al
as 1:2022cv06755
Plaintiff:
Amyris Clean Beauty, Inc. and Amyris, Inc.
Defendant:
Nababy LLC and Wong Rachel
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Andrew Roth v. Foris Ventures, LLC, et al
as 22-16632
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ANDREW E. ROTH
Defendant / Appellant:
FORIS VENTURES, LLC, VALLEJO VENTURES TRUST U/T/A, L. JOHN DOERR and others
Andrew Roth v. Foris Ventures, LLC, et al
as 22-16633
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANDREW E. ROTH
Defendant / Appellee:
FORIS VENTURES, LLC, VALLEJO VENTURES TRUST U/T/A, L. JOHN DOERR and others
Andrew Roth v. Foris Ventures, LLC, et al
as 22-80093
Respondent:
ANDREW E. ROTH
Petitioner:
FORIS VENTURES, LLC, VALLEJO VENTURES TRUST U/T/A, L. JOHN DOERR and others
Amyris, Inc. et al v. Pat McGrath Cosmetics, Inc.
as 3:2022cv00567
Plaintiff:
Amyris, Inc. and Clean Beauty Collaborative, Inc
Defendant:
Pat McGrath Cosmetics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Shane Mulderrig, et al v. Amyris, Inc., et al
as 21-80130
Respondent:
SHANE MULDERRIG and RONY DEVORAH, individually and on behalf of and all others similarly situated
Petitioner:
AMYRIS, INC., JOHN G. MELO and KATHLEEN VALIASEK
LAVVAN, Inc. v. Amyris, Inc.
as 21-1819
Plaintiff / Appellee:
LAVVAN, Inc.
Defendant / Appellant:
Amyris, Inc.
Roth v. Foris Ventures, LLC et al
as 4:2021cv04288
Defendant:
Amyris, Inc., Ann Doerr, Foris Ventures, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew E Roth
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
