Cases 1 - 10 of 510
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00228
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00229
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00230
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Fair Debt Collection Act
Rivera v. Anderson et al
as 7:2024cv00224
Plaintiff:
Denis Alberto Rivera
Defendant:
David Anderson, Harold W. Clarke, Randall C. Mathena and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burrell et al v. Anderson et al
as 7:2024cv00210
Plaintiff:
Joel Aaron Burrell, Tyler Bly, Joshua Clamp and others
Defendant:
David Anderson, A. King, J. West and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hunt v. Anderson
as 3:2024cv00202
Petitioner:
Floyd O. Hunt, Jr.
Respondent:
D. Anderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Moyler v. Dotson et al
as 7:2024cv00186
Plaintiff:
Thomas Moyler and Shiek Thomas Moyler-Bey
Defendant:
Chadwick Dotson, D. Anderson, J. Bateman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blakeney v. Anderson et al
as 7:2024cv00150
Plaintiff:
Dean Blakeney
Defendant:
Warden D. Anderson, Intel R. Hickman and Nottoway Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ra v. Anderson et al
as 7:2024cv00106
Plaintiff:
Ashann Ra and Ashaun Ra
Defendant:
David E. Anderson, Lt. J.B. Robinson, Lt. R. Hickman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NaJacque v. Anderson
as 3:2024cv00088
Plaintiff:
Leonard W. NaJacque
Defendant:
David W. Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
