Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01431
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
FOSTER v. WARD et al
as 5:2023cv00143
Plaintiff:
JOHN M FOSTER
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY C WARD, WILKES, WARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03663
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Heath v. RPM Dining
as 22-51006
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Natalie Heath, also known as Hazel Pepper, Brenna Wilder, Tara Headrick and others
Defendant / Appellant:
RPM Dining, L.L.C., by next friend Yellow Rose
GS Holistic, LLC v. Hollywood Zaza Smoke & Vape LLC et al
as 2:2022cv07448
Plaintiff:
GS Holistic, LLC
Defendant:
Hollywood Zaza Smoke & Vape LLC d/b/a Zaza Smoke Shop, Andrea Harris, Christopher Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121 Trademark Infringement
Harris v. Haynes
as 1:2022cv02881
Petitioner:
Andreas Harris
Respondent:
Courtney Haynes
Not Classified By Court:
Minor Child
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 11601 International Child Abduction Remedies Act
Harris v. Jacquez
as 2:2022cv00899
Petitioner:
Ardela Denis Andrea Harris
Respondent:
Israel Jacquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Heath et al v. TFS Dining, LLC et al
as 1:2020cv00890
Plaintiff:
Natalie Heath, Tara Headrick, Brenna Wilder and others
Defendant:
Jon Persinger, Kenny Doe, TFS Dining, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv04728
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 185 Suit to Compel Arbitration
TMIF Sonoma Ridge LLC v. Harris
as 1:2020cv00049
Plaintiff:
TMIF Sonoma Ridge LLC
Defendant:
Andrea Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
