Cases 1 - 9 of 9
MARSHALL v CORBETT et al
as 2:2014cv01210
Plaintiff:
KERRY X MARSHALL
Defendant:
TOM CORBETT, JOHN WETZEL, JOHN DOE #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Philip Maier v. James Pall, et al
as 14-2955
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PHILIP MAIER
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES PALL, FACILITY CHAPLAINCY COORDINATOR, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, NORMAN DEMMING, CORRECTIONS CLASSIFICATION PROGRAM MANAGER, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, MICHAEL KLOPOTOSKI and others
Marshall v. Corbett et al
as 3:2013cv02961
Plaintiff:
Kerry X Marshall
Defendant:
Tom Corbett, John Wetzel, John K. Murray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jeffrey Thompson v. Shirley Moore Smeal, et al
as 12-2371
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEFFREY THOMPSON
Defendant - Appellee:
SHIRLEY SMEAL, Acting Secretary of Corrections, ANDREA PRIORI-MEINTEL, Director Bureau of Treatment Services and ULLI KLEMM, Administrator for Religion and Volunteer Services
Theron v. The County of York et al
as 3:2011cv01550
Plaintiff:
John Theron
Defendant:
The County of York, Doug Hoke, Mary Sabol and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Benchoff v. Wetzel et al
as 3:2011cv01106
Plaintiff:
Robert Benchoff
Defendant:
John Wetzel, Andrea Priori-Meintel, Diane Yale and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thompson v. Smeal et al
as 3:2011cv00340
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Thompson
Defendant:
Shirley Moore Smeal , Andrea Priori Meintel and Ulli Klemm
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rivera v. Rendell et al
as 3:2010cv00505
Plaintiff:
Roberto C Rivera
Defendant:
Ed Rendell, Jeffrey Beard, James C Barnacle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alex v. Beard et al
as 1:2009cv01711
Plaintiff:
Anthony J. Alex
Defendant:
Jeffrey A. Beard, -, Andrea Priori Meintel, Joseph P. Nish and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
