Cases 1 - 10 of 72
Alford v. Chambers-Smith et al
as 2:2024cv04184
Defendant:
R. Huff, Patricia Horner, DRC- Director Anette Chambers-Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Brian Keith Alford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Redwood et al
as 1:2024cv00306
Defendant:
Kelly Storm, Dr. Aradhana Gill, R. Hale and others
Plaintiff:
James Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Babineau v. Collins et al
as 2:2024cv02072
Plaintiff:
James A. Babeneau and James Allen Babineau
Defendant:
Warden Emma Collins, Arthur Hale, M.D., Andrew Eddy, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Butler v. Eddy et al.
as 3:2024cv00461
Plaintiff:
Benjanell Butler, Jr.
Defendant:
Dr. Andrew Eddy, David Caudill and Landon Kohls
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Colston v. Eddy
as 2:2023cv01599
Plaintiff:
Spencer Colston
Defendant:
Andrew Eddy, M.D.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Straughter v. Eddy et al
as 2:2023cv01268
Plaintiff:
Valdez J. Straughter
Defendant:
Dr Andrew Eddy, Karen Stanforth, Jenny Hildebrand and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Criswell v. Chambers-Smith et al
as 3:2022cv01784
Plaintiff:
Desmond Criswell
Defendant:
Annette Chambers-Smith, Dr. Andrew Eddy, Warden Harold May and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stoutamire v. Eddy
as 2:2022cv02037
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Stoutamire
Defendant:
Dr Andrew Eddy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Powers v. Eddy
as 2:2021cv01195
Defendant:
Andrew Eddy, M.D.
Plaintiff:
Floyd Powers
Interested Party:
State of Ohio -Interested Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Larson v. Eppinger et al
as 2:2020cv04997
Defendant:
Lashann Eppinger, Karen Stanforth, Vanessa Shepherd and others
Plaintiff:
Terry L. Larson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
