Cases 1 - 10 of 39
Alexander v. Higgins et al
as 4:2022cv00900
Plaintiff:
Andrew Alexander
Defendant:
Higgins, Calvin, Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Andrew Alexander
as 22-2251
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ANDREW ALEXANDER
Alexander v. Hubbert et al
as 4:2021cv00147
Plaintiff:
Andrew Alexander
Defendant:
Lakeisha Hubbert, First Name Unknown Emerson and John Does 1-5
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Alexander v. Hubbert et al
as 4:2021cv00129
Plaintiff:
Andrew Alexander
Defendant:
Lakeisha Hubbert, First Name Unknown Emerson and John Does 1-5
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
ALEXANDER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv57655
Plaintiff:
ANDREW ALEXANDER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00869
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ALEXANDER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv18254
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ANDREW ALEXANDER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Andrew Alexander v. Dusty Dodson
as 21-1397
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Andrew Alexander
Defendant:
Dallas County Detention Center and United States Marshal Service
Defendant / Appellee:
Dusty Dodson, Administrator, Dallas County Jail
STEEL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv72055
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ANDREW ALEXANDER STEEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MCLEAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv33559
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DANIEL ANDREW ALEXANDE MCLEAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
