Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Andrew Andersen v. Marisela Montes, et al
as 19-16200
Defendant / Appellee:
TAMIZA HOCKENHULL, Deputy Commissioner of California Board of Parole Hearings, NAMEETA SAHNI, JENNIFER SHAFFER, Chief Executive Officer of Board of Parole Hearings and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANDREW ANDERSEN
Andrew Andersen v. Marisela Montes, et al
as 19-15969
Defendant / Appellee:
TAMIZA HOCKENHULL, Deputy Commissioner of California Board of Parole Hearings, JENNIFER SHAFFER, Chief Executive Officer of Board of Parole Hearings, NAMEETA SAHNI, Forensic Psychologist and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANDREW ANDERSEN
Andrew Andersen v. Scott Kernan
as 18-15254
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANDREW ANDERSEN
Defendant - Appellee:
SCOTT KERNAN, Secretary of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Andrew Andersen v. Marisela Montes, et al
as 17-16610
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANDREW ANDERSEN
Defendant - Appellee:
MARISELA MONTES, Commissioner of California Board of Parole Hearings, TAMIZA HOCKENHULL, Deputy Commissioner of California Board of Parole Hearings, NAMEETA SAHNI and others
Andersen v. Greg Mascaro Enterprises Incorporated et al
as 2:2017cv00934
Plaintiff:
Andrew Andersen
Defendant:
Greg Mascaro Enterprises Incorporated and Gregory Mascaro
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Andrew Andersen v. Jeffery Beard
as 14-15202
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANDREW ANDERSEN
Defendant - Appellee:
JEFFERY BEARD, Secretary of the California Dept. of Corrections and Rehabilitation in his official capacity
Andersen et al v. Brown
as 5:2011cv03752
Plaintiff:
Andrew Andersen, Thomas Clinton and Orrin Carr
Defendant:
Edmund J. Brown, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Andersen v. Cate et al
as 3:2009cv01055
Plaintiff:
Andrew Andersen
Defendant:
M. Cate, M. Montes, N. Grannis and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.