Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Wood v. United States of America
as 2:2023cv01522
Petitioner:
Michael Andrew Wood
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Wood v. United States of America
as 2:2023cv01521
Petitioner:
Michael Andrew Wood
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Wood v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2019cv00036
Respondent:
Attorney General, State of Florida and Secretary, Department of Corrections
Petitioner:
Louis Andrew Wood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wood v. State of Florida
as 2:2018cv14193
Plaintiff:
Louis Andrew Wood
Defendant:
State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Louis Wood v. J. Williams, et al
as 17-14283
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LOUIS ANDREW WOOD
Defendant - Appellee:
J. WILLIAMS, Ex-Assistant Warden/Grievance Coordinator, Dade Correctional Institution, in his individual capacity, L. NORWOOD, Ex-Assistant Warden/Grievance Coordinator, Dade Correctional Institution, in his individual capacity, N. THORTON, Ex-Librarian, Dade Correctional Institution, in her individual capacity and others
Wood v. Williams et al
as 1:2017cv22579
Plaintiff:
Louis Andrew Wood
Defendant:
J. Williams, L. Norwood, N. Thorton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Wood v. Oldham et al
as 2:2016cv02115
Plaintiff:
Micah Andrew Wood
Defendant:
Bill Oldham, Shelby County Criminal Justice Center and Hammons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wood v. Smith et al
as 2:2010cv02469
Petitioner:
James Andrew Wood
Respondent:
D Smith and Unknown Party
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
US v. Andrew Kacvinsky
as 10-7030
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ANDREW WOODS KACVINSKY
Kacvinsky v. USA
as 1:2010cv00573
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Andrew Woods Kacvinsky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
