Cases 1 - 10 of 474
Mejia v. Lamont et al
as 3:2025cv00373
Plaintiff:
Tommy Mejia
Defendant:
Ned Lamont, S. Carlos, Angel Quiros and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hunter v. Reis et al
as 3:2025cv00349
Plaintiff:
Paul Hunter
Defendant:
Jennifer Reis, Angel Quiros, Correction Officer Henry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perez v. Quiros
as 25-454
Plaintiff:
OMETRIUS PEREZ
Defendant:
ANGEL QUIROS, Commissioner of the Connecticut Department of Correction, in the Official capacities, CONNECTICUT DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, in the Official capacities, COLLEEN GALLAGER, Correctional Health Service Program Director, in the Official capacities and others
Randolph v. Quiros
as 3:2025cv00284
Plaintiff:
Anthony Randolph
Defendant:
Angel Quiros
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Dubose v. Quiros
as 3:2025cv00271
Petitioner:
Darius Dubose
Defendant:
Angel Quiros
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
McKnight v. Quiros et al
as 3:2025cv00205
Plaintiff:
Shaka McKnight
Defendant:
Comm. Angel Quiros, Lt. Garibaldi, Lt. Torres and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2025cv00174
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Patry v. Quiros et al
as 3:2025cv00143
Plaintiff:
Brandy L. Patry
Defendant:
Angel Quiros and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Patry v. Quiros et al
as 3:2025cv00119
Plaintiff:
Brandy L Patry
Defendant:
Angel Quiros and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Style v. Quiros et al
as 3:2025cv00104
Plaintiff:
Komar Sheam Style
Defendant:
Angel Quiros, Ruben Burgos, Richardson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
