Cases 1 - 10 of 37
De Los Angeles Alvarez v. Garland
as 22-60528
Petitioner:
Amparo De Los Angeles Alvarez, Brayan Orlando Reyes-Alvarez and Jenifer Estefany Reyes-Alvarez
Respondent:
Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General
ALVAREZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv02379
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ANGEL ALVAREZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ALVAREZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv53088
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ANGEL ALVAREZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ALVAREZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv19337
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ANGEL ALVAREZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Angel Alvarado

as 20-50083
Defendant / Appellant:
ANGEL ALVAREZ ALVARADO
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Alvarez v. Peters et al

as 1:2019cv06789
Defendant:
NYCPD, Commissioners NYPD and Detective Robert Peters
Plaintiff:
Angel Alvarez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Alvarez v. Cambridge Kitchens MFG Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv05419
Defendant:
Neoklis Vasiliades and Cambridge Kitchens MFG Inc.
Plaintiff:
Angel Alvarez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Alvarez v. Peralta et al
as 5:2017cv00549
Plaintiff:
Jose Angel Alvarez , Jr.
Defendant:
John Cirane, FNU Garcia, FNU Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jose Alvarez, Jr. v. Fox Ronald, et al
as 16-50714
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSE ANGEL ALVAREZ, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
FOX RONALD, Head Warden, TIMOTHY AULT, Assistant Warden, ANDRES PISARIO, Correctional Officer Sergeant and others
Alvarez v. Ronald et al
as 5:2016cv00162
Plaintiff:
Jose Angel Alvarez, Jr.
Defendant:
Timothy Ault, J. Braley, P. Chapa and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - 42:1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.